Iran willing to reduce uranium enrichment to avoid British sanctions
Iran is ready to significantly reduce uranium enrichment. British re -crushing the United Nations sanctionsTelegraph was told.
Iranian officials said Tehran was willing to soften his hard stance to avoid more military strikes than Israel. and the United States.
Ali Larjani, the newly appointed Secretary of Iran’s High National Security CouncilIt leads to efforts to persuade the office regime to reduce the uranium enrichment from 60 percent to 20 percent purity.
Current Enrichment level Approaching roughly 90 percent It was necessary for the development of nuclear weapons, creating international concerns about Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
England, France and Germany threatened to re -strengthened the economic sanctions abolished in 2015, unless the Islamic Republic began negotiations to renew nuclear talks by the end of August 2025.
Credit: Reuters
The “Snapback” article in the 2015 nuclear agreement ends in October and presses Europeans to take action before losing the opportunity to restart the regime.
Under the Snapback mechanismAny party may violate Iran by violating it and restore sanctions. When the Snapback article ends, new sanctions will need UN approval and can be prevented by China or Russia.
The 2015 Comprehensive Action Plan provided significant relief from about ten years of trade and banking restrictions in exchange for the boundaries on Iran’s economic economy and the nuclear enrichment program designed to prevent weapons development.
Return to the potential 20 percent enrichment will be an important step from Iran’s current capabilities, but will still exceed the 3.67 percent limit established within the scope of the 2015 agreement.
A high -level Iranian authorized authorized Telegraph said: “The Larjani system is trying to convince the system to reduce the level of enrichment to avoid another war.
“The system is worried that the system will face another great difficulty without dropping it or meeting some of the West demands.”
He said that Larijani wanted to reduce enrichment to 20 percent, but he first faced the opposition from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
However, the authority said that the leadership of the regime seems to be willing to obey the Western forces and to interact again.
Masoud Pesshkian, Iranian President68 -year -old Mr. Larijani again appointed a position he had previously held from September 2005 to October 2007.
He served as one of the representatives of Ayatullah Khamenei in the council and directed Iran’s nuclear negotiations with world forces.
During the first term of Larjani, Iran’s nuclear case was directed to the UN Security Council by the Governor of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) six months after his role.
Now, when he returns to the position, the same three European countries are preparing to send Iran’s nuclear file back to the Security Council if diplomatic progress stops.
Iranian missiles exhibited at a rally to celebrate the 45th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in 1979 – Hay/AFP via Getty
Abbas Araghchi on Friday, Iranian Foreign MinisterIn order to discuss avoiding the recapture of UN sanctions, French, German and British colleagues spoke on the phone and agreed to meet them next week.
European concern has increased since Tehran cut off all cooperation with IAEA after the 12-day Iran-Israeli War in June.
This left the international community even blind to Iran’s program and Status of uranium stock.
After his call on Friday, a statement published in the name of Mr. Araghchi criticized the “legal and moral qualities üzere in order to threaten the sanctions of the countries, but the persistent talks will continue.
“The Islamic Republic of Iran has never abandoned the path of diplomacy, just as it acted as authorized in defense, and is ready for any diplomatic solution that guarantees the rights and interests of the Iranian people.”
The internal pressure on Iran’s leadership shows divisions about how to interact with the West within the regime.
KHAMENEI, 86, Print pressure from faces from their ranks Choosing between nuclear ambitions and regime survival.
Since Israel’s June military strike, only two public opinion has made and in recent weeks have not discussed public opinion.
Ayatollah Khanei, the highest leader of Iran, is one of the few public matches in recent months on June 4th – Anadolu through Getty
Iran’s reformist coalition In exchange for the abolition of the US sanctions, he called on the uranium enrichment to suspend, and at the same time defended internal changes.
Hardliners attacked the reformists by saying that they were playing on the enemy side ”.
‘They shot us, we are rebuilding’
At a press conference this month, Iran’s president solved months of diplomacy and triggered a political crisis that revealed cracks under the leadership of the country.
“If we don’t talk, what should we do? Do you want to fight?” Mr Pezshkian asked. “They hit us, we’re rebuilding, and they’re gonna hit us again.”
The explanations reacted. The IRGC officials questioned the decision, conservative articles accused him of weakness and illuminated with calls for accusing social media.
The analysts emphasized how vulnerable Mr. Pesshkian is for a year, because Hardliners see his foreign policy more and more naive and harmful to Iran’s interests.
The most powerful rebuke came from the security organization. Aziz Ghazanfari, IRGC Deputy Political ChiefHe warned that repeated oral errors could endanger national security.
“Foreign policy is not a place to specify every truth, G Ghazanfari wrote on the Bassirat website of the IRGC. “The dangers of the careless words of senior officials fall first to their governments.”
Khamenei has the ultimate authority on Iran’s political, military and ideological issues, including foreign policy and national security. The president and parliament operate under his influence.
Meanwhile, the Iranian Ministry of Defense is conducting ballistic missile exercises that seem to be a military preparation show in the midst of diplomatic tensions.
Khanenei’s Senior Advisor Brig Gen Rahim Safavi stressed Iran’s military stance in recent statements.
He said: “Now we are in a war, and this situation is likely to collapse at any moment.”
Safavi added that the Iranian military officials believed that those who want peace should be ready for war and that the best defense method is attack ”.
‘Iran gave a pearl and took sugar’
Larjani’s current diplomatic approach contrasts with its previous hard stance.
In October 2003, Hassan Rouhani agreed to temporarily suspend the enrichment of uranium after his visits to Tehran as the President of Iran. “Iran gave a pearl and took sugar from the west.”
A professor of political science at a university near Tehran said that the regime was at a critical point that was fragmented between satisfying domestic supporters and dealing with the West.
He said: “This is difficult – they could not do both at the same time, and now it is even more difficult.
“Many believe that interaction with the West is equivalent to losing a preventive strike against us.
“But the truth is that they have no choice but to find a way to survive. This may mean that perhaps only reducing the level of enrichment as a way to take time.
“They were trying to move forward in the past – now they’re trying to go back to where they were before the US strike.”
While the internal political calculations of the regime see the harsh factions as any concessions to the West, pragmatic sounds became increasingly complex while arguing that constant challenge could lead to the collapse of the regime.
