Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s Indian migrants comments, unedited

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was open: He has nothing to apologize.

His comments about ABC last week – he said that he was “a concern about the Indian community – that this community was“ a concern about the Indian community – that came to Australia – Australia.

Senior Liberal Alex Hawke said that by making a public jolt at the price and accusing him with “cowardly and inappropriate” behavior towards his staff after the interview. Guardian Australia Price ‘how his comments were misinterpreted and then armed by Emek ”.

The price insisted when it was criticized at the beginning He only indicated the facts:

What I do is, yes, he said Indian immigrants will be the second largest group of immigrants in this country and soon the largest group of immigrants in this country. A recent Redbridge survey told us that 85% of the Indian lineage – and in the meantime, my children were involved – 85% of them voted for labor… So, the facts I pointed out.

Here are the original speech about demographic features and voting, Taken from Price’s own website. Has his comments “sprained from the context” or reported correctly? Be a judge:

Partricia Karveas: So, is it just the core number or the type of immigrants?

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price: No, I believe it is the basic number. And definitely core number. You know, and of course, there is a focus on taking them from this government to others from certain countries.

Karveas: Isn’t it a non -discriminatory policy?

Price: I think the Labor Party wants to ensure that they will allow those who will support their policies and opinions and vote for them.

Karveas: Do you think that they are actively conducting a migration program to bring people that you think they will be open to their ideas?

Price: Definitely. This is labor. Basically, it is difficult at all costs. And we see that this happens everywhere in terms of the way they execute themselves. We see that they like to influence the influence of trade unions. Ultimately about the power.

Karveas: So, who do you think they’re trying to bring them to vote for labor?

Price: Well, more laboring, probably …

Karveas: … But there were right -wing and left wings in every society, not, but who?

Price: As we have seen, you know, that is, you said it was a concern with the Indian community – and because it was just a large number. And we can see it reflected in the way of voting for the society at the same time. So, if, okay, if these individuals will see a reflection for us than other parts of the community, then, of course, such individuals will express the opinion that we will get to our communities. And we heard this coming …

Karveas: … They used to object, right? Can you accept that? They said that it was a non -discriminatory policy that has nothing to do with assumptions about how people voted. But do you think there is any evidence to say what they do?

Price: The worker competes with many things. However, we have seen how they carried out themselves over the years. And even more, from someone who depends on the indigenous community and the emotions around him. There are those who do not have the ability to withdraw to the same kind of education history or withdrawal, what are the policies that work for us? What does he not do? No, they take their claws to the communities and allows them to believe that labor will remove them from boredom and give them the opportunities they want. But ultimately, they become more dependent on the labor and welfare system.

Karveas: So, do you think there are certain groups that vote for high numbers for labor such as the Indian community?

Price: I don’t think it’s just an Indian community. I think this is definitely public service. You know, any group that certainly understands that they can rely on Labour’s high spending in terms of welfare in this country.