Journalists taking Trump at face value are too gullible for words

Gullib journalism helped to transform the Trump project into a living nightmare for the United States. Dr Victoria Fielding.

When is the US President Donald Trump During the 2024 election campaign, Heritage Foundation ‘S Project 2025 The agenda would take a surprising level of purity to accept its claims in nominal value. Considering how constantly demonstrates Trump itself, it is an insecure proof that everything he claims has not happened and that this happened.

Nevertheless, despite Trump’s known fraud, the mainstream media journalists took Trump. Now, the US voters of the media are subjected to the results of the failures of warning about the reality of life in Project-2025-Mectoriter-America, a fact that defies the sustainability of American democracy.

Before President Biden Withdrawal from the 2024 election and Kamala during Harris offerThe Democrats regularly warned their voters Trump’s 2025 agenda on the terrible consequences of the 2025 agenda.

These warnings were the front and center of the Michigan senator in the Democrat’s Election Agreement Mallory mcmorrow exhibited A printed copy of the 900 -page project 2025 document, “Republican plan for a second Trump period”.

It is reset to one of the thousands of plans for a Trump Presidency of the document, MCMORW in question:

“If Donald Trump returns to the White House and decides that they do not serve his personal agenda, he will shoot officers such as intelligence officers, engineers and even federal prosecutors”.

McMornrow continued to warn under the plan, just as dictators did:

“… Trump can armed the Ministry of Justice to pursue his political opponents. He can even turn the FBI into his personal police force.”

Stating that people can think that all of them are illegal, thanks to Trump “Sandal Supreme Court. Even if he violates the law, now he’s not completely immune to the prosecution “.

In addition to the Democrats, progressive media organizations and commentators did their jobs investigating the agenda of the 2025 agenda written by the “Thinking Office ılan, financed by the billionaire, the inheritance foundation. For example, in September 2024, Guardian‘S Rachel Leinggang He wrote that the plan summarized how Trumpism can be institutionalized to “raise the US government ile, including the inheritance Foundation allies and government affairs. “The mass deportation and restriction of legal immigration programs, including DAC, will dismantle the Ministry of Education.”

In response to the progresses emphasizing these terrible risks, you would think that the “guard” mainstream media would go to investigate this document and to work to report what it would mean for American citizens in Trump’s second period. It is the most important job in a democracy to provide voters to make voting decisions for the best interests for their best interests.

However, instead of conducting this important democratic work, journalists working in the largest and most powerful media organizations have been postponed to their cowards and apparently to endless purity. This meant that Trump was predictable – when he rejected the document, they shrugged and accepted their denial.

Incredibly, some of them went further and criticized their democrats for using the 2025 project to mislead Trump’s agenda.

A shocking example of this Real control PBS, who shed water to the warnings of the democrats, reported:

‘Project 2025 offers a comprehensive vision for an executive branch led by Republican, and some policies reflect Trump’s 2024 agenda. However, the Harris and the presidential campaign went very far to explain what the project wants and how closely the plans coincided with the Trump campaign. ‘

. Real control – Based on the blind belief that Trump himself says, he presents himself as an authority that Trump cannot do or certainly cannot do – the project claims that Trump will only reduce access, even though he wants to ban abortion 2025.

In addition, although the project 2025 does not plan to reduce social security, he suggests changes in Medicare, and that both of Trump and Project 2025 want to eliminate the educational department. In other words, even if the plans are not the same, they are still cut from the same fabric. And this is just what Trump accepts.

Even these outlets that report Trump distant During the election, he admitted that he did it only because of the public opinion from the 2025 Project. reaction. This is a huge clue that Trump rejecting the project is not an honest position, but a politically suitable position.

Even more ridiculous, when reporting About Trump’s rejection of the plan, journalists admitted that the architects of the plan would be under Trump – a huge clue to what the agenda of this administration will be.

These are journalists who follow Trump’s promises and denials in the past, which is not entirely true. They did not learn anything from this date, instead of constantly preferred to take Trump in a hundred value.

Nevertheless, the Democrats will never doubt the warning about the extreme and dangerous nature of Trump’s plans, and instead they will be politically hurt with these valid warnings. As usual, no matter what Trump does, he wins in the media and the democrats do what they do.

We all know how the story of Trump’s second period plays. Color shock, 200 days to Trump’s second period, real-adopters PBS host journalist David GrahamThe project is the author of a book about 2025.

Nevertheless, Trump was not ultimately in front of his eyes, such as the fact that Trump’s 2025 project was hired to manage the writers to key agencies, and the Trump administration’s proper fall into the plan. accepted Open Real social Closing will give him perfect lid PBS published the following for the 2025 project, which is the document he claimed to have read during the election title.

Without even the smallest chain, he read: