KAS officer’s acts prima facie ‘deeply seeped in corruption’, says Karnataka High Court, while refusing to quash disproportionate assets case

Muscle Officer B. observes Sudha’s actions Prima Facie “Corruption was deeply infiltrated”, the Supreme Court of Karnataka refused to disrupt the case of a disproportionate asset while emptying the police police without the permission of the court without the permission of the court.

Justice M. Nagaprasanna rejected a petition accused by Mrs. Sudha and her husband Strooiny Joseph Pais. 2 In the first information report (FIR).

“To quote the contents of the charging pet could not be a prejudiced defense of the petitions before the relevant court. Therefore, this court wants to quote content/observation in the accusation. Prima Facie They were all welcomed and petition no. 1 [Ms. Sudha] In particular, it leaks in depth to corruption. ”

Which material shows

“… Prima Facie The material on the power of the enormous documents collected during the investigation will undoubtedly require a trial. ”

The Supreme Court in August 2024 prevented him from opening an investigation report in front of a special court for his lawsuits without the permission of the police police, and the police presented the proposed picture of failure with the documents before the Supreme Court after the completion of the investigation.

While the defendant-daughter officer rejected the opinion that the investigation carried out was contrary to the law, the Supreme Court said that the 13th part of the Law on the Prevention of Corruption, while dealing with crimes for disproportionate assets, said that the investigation did not need to be approved in advance from the competent authority. The Supreme Court also found no transition to expressing the private court’s investigation complaint.

Background

On August 20, 2020, a special court, which was a special harmony made by an Abraham TJ, directed the investigation complaint to the Anti -Corruption Office (ACB) at that time. After ACB was injured, the Fir was transferred to the police police.

In the complaint, Mrs. Sudha, Bangalore Development Authority as the assistant commissioner and land acquisition officer fell into great corruption and Bengaluru, Udipi and Dodabalrapur, using the amount of rupees from the land was claimed to have purchased several immovable properties worth a few immovable properties.

It was claimed that he collected bribes through some agents that overthrew the complainant.

The complainant claimed that during the processing of land acquisition files, Mrs. Sudha provided the contact information of the land owners to its agents and then collected bribes from landowners for the payment of compensation for the land acquired.