KCR’s Solo Decisions Led to Mess: Report
Haydarabad: Kaleshwaram project was characterized by “Common and Fraudual Procedures and Financial Improlements, and it was learned that the Justice PC Ghose Investigation Commission report was concluded. The Commission stated that such embarrassing laws were ignored or violated, probably the result of “one decision -making”, which began with the choice of places for Annararam and Sundilla barga.
The report, which was planned to be discussed by the cabinet on Monday, clearly stated that there was no official “government’s decision ında to choose places for dams. The Commission has identified important responsibilities in Chandrashekar RAO for direct participation and established procedures and public expenditures.
“Common and brazen procedures and financial irregularities” learned that 677.77 Lakh be recovered from the authorities responsible for the payment of this amount to Wapcos Limited for the report of the commission. Stating that the report from Wapcos (previous water and power consultancy services (India)) was “thrown aside”, the money paid for the report should be recovered from those who approved the payment.
In the Medigadda Dam, the worst stroke, which is damaged by the most three, “Project officials and the agency (L&T, the company given the contract to build the dam), with gloves, they are tangible with gloves and that they act with an unjust intention and acting in an unjust intention and acting in a great amount of greatness, and a great amount of use. From a large amount of money, earning a large amount of money, earning a large amount of money, earning a large amount of money, earning a large amount of money, earning a large amount of money.
The report also found that the approvals for dams were never taken before the cabinet and that an interesting problem with the project cost, even before the last detailed project report was prepared by Wapcos, was found to have written a letter to the Prime Minister on 11.2.2016.
Initially designed in Pranahita-Chevella Srujala Sravanthi, the project, which was ‘redesigned’ by the BRS government by the BRS government, rose to 71,436 Crore in 2016.
The Justice Ghose Report was justified by the alleged “variations” on the allegation of “variations” on the allegation of “variations” because of the changing places and parameters of the government, Annararam and Sundilla dams, and built the Sundilla Dam in a way that builds Annararam in a way that built Annararam.
The commission was learned to reset that it could cause severe distress in the dams, probably due to continuous water retention of water, which is a directive of Chandrashekar RAO, but the dams were used for water satisfaction, not as storage structures. Since water is continuously storage, “These three bargles are at any time periodic controls/inspections, inspections, pre -and after and after -after -inspections and reports and so on.
IMPORTANT POINTS:
The dam of errors
Justice PC Ghose Commission report says:
Medigadda, Annararam, Sundilla’s only and the minister’s individual decision (irrigation) and dams in the Prime Minister.
There is no official ‘government’s decision’ on this issue.
Expert Committee, ‘Prohibition Cost and Time Consumption’ because of the rejection of the dam in Medigadda reported.
The report was at that time by CM and the Minister of Irrigation ‘intentionally … not taken into consideration’ and ‘kept in the cold warehouse’.
Dams designed on ‘permeable foundations’ were used as’ storage structures’ contrary to standard applications’.
Important studies such as ‘back water studies, tail water rating curves and geophysical research were not done’;
Quality control aspects were insufficient in sequant piles, the most important component of dam structures and vertical controls were marked as ‘yes’ without any measurement.
