BBC Doctor Who star Noel Clarke is arrested as police carry out five-hour raid – days after being hit with £3m legal bill for lost libel case
Doctor Yıldız Noel Clarke was arrested during a five -hour raid of his house – days after the defeat in the slander case.
Officers, 49 -year -old BBC player Kensington, Western London family home in the morning just before 9 am, the search went with a expert dog unit.
The arrest of Clarke this morning is following the failed slander against the Guardian newspaper. It is not known why he was arrested.
In a six -week civilian case, more than 12 female actor gave evidence that they had been sexually harassed or harassed.
The police spent at least five hours at home on Thursday and the officers left with boxes with laptops and documents.
Clarke was in custody to question later. Daily Mail applied to the police for more information.
Star, a Supreme Judge of the Supreme Court, which reigned on Monday, should pay at least £ 3 million legal costs of Guardian Publisher’s legal costs after ‘brought remote’ and ‘fake lawsuits’ against the newspaper’s reporting of sexual abuse allegations.
Smated Star said that in April 2021, 20 women who recognize him professionally came to the fore with abuse allegations.
Doctor Who Star Christmas Clarke was arrested today during a five -hour raid of his house today after the sex abuse slander case
Clarke rejected the allegations and his lawyers said that the newspaper’s career had acted as ‘judge, jury and executioner’.
The GNM defended his reports both in the right and public interest, and in a decision last month, judge Mrs. Justice Steyn adopted.
At a Supreme Court hearing on Monday, Clarke said that he should pay £ 3 million ahead of the total costs to be recovered, and was estimated to be more than £ 6 million.
“It seems to me that it is appropriate to the amount of 3 million pounds sought by the defendant and is not more than a reasonable order in this case,” he said.
‘It is significantly lower than the possible healing level in the detailed assessment of the accused, and therefore allows a large error margin in my decision.’
‘The plaintiff continued a very difficult and wrong lawsuit that the articles were not significantly true, following the allegations of fraud against the real witnesses of the accused.’
