‘No Corner Of The Country Is Safe’: India’s Proposed Agni-5 ICBM Test Puts Pakistan On Edge, Islamabad Think Tank Warns Army, Govt | World News

Islamabad: Fear is increasing in India’s AGNI-5 missile program in Pakistan. The Islamabad -based Strategic Vision Institute (SVI) stressed the security risks of Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif and Asim Munir, the Chief of Army Asim Munir. SVI said that the proposed test may have extensive effects on regional stability.

The AGNI-5 missile carries multiple war heads and can be independent of a few targets. It is considered an extremely advanced weapon that is equipped with independently targeted multiple re -entry tool (MIRV) technology.

SVI stressed that Pakistan cannot ignore India’s nuclear AGNI V or AGNI VI missile tests, which form the backbone of India’s longest -range missile arsenal.

The Thinking Starter emphasized that in 2016, the missile program of India accelerated after the participation of the missile technology control regime (MTCR). Access to advanced technologies and equipment increased. India also bought drones from the US and Israel, which was used during the conflict with Pakistan in May.

The organization warned that missiles with a range of more than 8,000 kilometers and nuclear capacity pointed out the ambition of India to have a global impact. Big cities around the world, including Washington, Moscow, Beijing, Beijing and all Pakistan, can not reach these weapons potentially.

India is expanding sea strike power

The SVI also emphasized the increasing presence of India in the Indian Ocean with a submarine -powered nuclear -powered submarines with the submarine. In mind, the ongoing tests of advanced AGNI missile systems send a message to India’s competitors exhibiting their strategic ambitions.

The SVI warned the Pakistani government and army that the international community should pressure India to avoid actions that may weaken regional stability. The Institute called on India to focus on preventing aggressive movements against Pakistan and solving disagreements through dialogue and diplomacy.