No-one liked Anthony Albanese’s response to US attack on Iran

No one seems to be satisfied with the response of Anthony Albanian to the Iranian attack of Anthony.

On pages Australia, A few authors claimed that he was very slow and very timid in the Prime Minister’s response. “The confusion, passivity and weakness of PM made us irrelevant” piece By Greg Sheridan yesterday.

“On Monday, the government said that on Monday, the government said that Australia supported the US actions in Iran through Grited teeth.

Anything else“Anthony Albanian and Penny Wong are too slow to support Iran strikes by Packham.

Editorial Team Sydney Morning Herald there Similar lineHe should criticize Albania’s “lame silence, and say that he should make his stance on Sunday“ loudly and net ”.

Then in the parliament, Albanian critics hit in turn because they support US air strikes.

Independent Senator Jacqui Lambie in question He added that the Albanian was “leaning on Trump”, “shameful ve and that Albanian should begin to“ stand ”to the“ bloody sociopath ”in the White House.

Greens Foreign Spokesman David Shoebridge accused Albanians added the following to work with Trump to “fueled in favor”: “Obviously, many countries are desperate to get the approval of an increasingly irregular and dangerous Trump administration.

The opposition asked Liberal Foreign Spokesman Andrew Hastie to blame Albania for being “very slow and very passive in his response.

“Yesterday we heard a spokesman from the government, this was a very uncertain explanation, and today we just heard from the Prime Minister” in question On Monday.

Albanian threw a vial even from some of his own party. Doug Cameron, former workers’ senator and union leader, speaks as a worker boss against war, said Guardian Australia The group condemned the Albanian government’s support for Trump’s strikes.

Uz We believe it is illegal and believe that the Labor Party, which has been going on for a long time, is inconsistent with its support for the United Nations and United Nations regulations, ”he said. “[The government’s position] It is inconsistent with long labor support for peace and nuclear disarmament. “

In the case of the Iranian situation, the Albanian government is just to criticize because the Iranian status is extremely opaque when it comes to the Iranian situation, including refusing to answer questions about whether Australian signal facilities are used as part of the attack. And yes, it was not a particularly impressive demonstration, especially to make a statement through an anonymous spokesman, and then wait 24 hours before commenting.

However, critics should not forget that Albanian has a stronger and more clear attitude than many other world leaders, especially among the US and allies.

On Monday, the Albania, who confirmed the support of the Australian government on strike, said to a press conference with Penny Wong: “The world has long acknowledged that Iran has not been allowed to buy nuclear weapons, and we support the action to prevent it – what is it.” “The US action turned to certain areas at the center of Iran’s nuclear program. Iran did not come back to the table as it did not conform to its international obligations. We call on Iran not to take any other action that could destabilize the region.”

Among the leaders who condemned the US action were high -level officials of many nations in Russia, China, North Korea and Latin America and the Middle East.

However, it is more difficult to find leaders who express open support for strikes. Apart from the United States, Israel and Australia did not applaud many people. A remarkable exception was the Argentine government led by the right -wing Liberter Maverick Javier Milei. Support Trump’s intervention.

Many other allies much more precisely balancing actionIran should not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons while calling to return to the negotiation table and underline the risks in a wider war.

For example, the European Union Foreign Policy Chief Kaja Kallas [and] Back to the negotiation table ”. Even England, which resembles Australia with the US, took a relatively uncertain stance. Prime Minister Keir Starmer in question The United States “a serious threat to international security lar labeled the nuclear program lanmak took action to alleviate the threat”.

Meanwhile, Starmer Foreign Minister David Lammy Did this A 15 -minute interview without withdrawing whether it supports air strikes on BBC radio. He also refrained from interpreting whether they were legal and fired questions about whether Britain support Trump’s speech. regime change In Tehran.

Better or worse, Albania emerged as one of the several world leaders who clearly syllabic support to the US Air Striles. The questions will now be that Trump has notifications and how much Australia is willing to follow the US President. With News on one night It is likely that Iran has attacked US military bases in Qatar, and things are likely to increase rapidly.