‘Credible intelligence’ of severe damage to nuclear sites, CIA says

In the National Intelligence Director’s office, Iran’s former Intelligence Director Normal Roule said that CNN closely follows the facilities in front of the operation, which can give confidence that the nuclear material has not moved to anywhere else.

At the NATO Summit, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that a Uranium conversion facility was erased in Isfahan, bombing with missiles from the US submarine.

“We can’t find it… Where it used to be on the map. Everything was just dark. Gone,” he said. “You can’t build nuclear weapons without the transformation facility.”

Rubio said that 12 of the US’s 13,000 kilograms of shelter bombs, 12 of the US, a nuclear nuclear area buried under a mountain, and two of the bombs in another region in Natanz have dropped two of the bombs partially destroyed by Israeli attacks.

Rubio from Fordow said, “Everything under the mountain is in bad condition,” he said.

“Everything in the world can be rebuilt. But now we know where it is, and if they try to rebuild, we have options there.”

In an interview with the US news site PolicyRubio acknowledged that it is not yet possible to determine the degree of deep damage underground and it was difficult to put a timeline for a complete assessment.

However, the government, various components “important, important, permanent damage” was made.

“We just learn more about it,” he said. “As a result, they [Iran] Today, the nuclear weapon is far further than the president before doing this brave action. “

Loading

This was supported by the statement of the CIA director John Ratcliffe, who said that Iran’s nuclear program has returned for years.

“The CIA may show that a reliable intelligence group has been seriously damaged by the last, targeted strikes of Iran’s nuclear program,” he said.

“This contains new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate resource/method, and several important Iranian nuclear facilities have been destroyed and will have to be rebuilt over the years.”

National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard made a statement that the new intelligence confirmed that the sites have been destroyed and that they said that they were a part of a “illegal leak -leaking” document in the “propaganda media”.

It is likely that uncertainty will be distracted unless there is access to the sites. However, two analysts, David Albright and Spencer Fenagasso Science and Security Institute on Wednesday on Wednesday, the damage caused by both the US and Israeli strikes, said the damage was severe and important.

Operations effectively destroyed Iran’s centrifugal enrichment program, “It will take a long time for Iran to come to any place before the attack,” he said.

However, Albright and Faragasso wrote that “60 percent, 20 percent, 20 percent and 3-5 percent enriched uraniums and centrifuges, but have not yet been established to Natanz or Fordow,” he wrote.

“These non -destroyed pieces pose a threat to the future that they can be used to produce weapons class uranium.”

In addition to based their analysis on high -resolution commercial satellite images, they reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Israeli Defense Forces.

In the meantime, Trump said that any media report questioning the degree of damage as a patriot and flying from Missouri, Bunker-Buster bombs, and an insulting B-2 bombardment planes, which was accepted as an impressive success.

He accelerated the attacks on CNN in NATO and social media. New York Timespioneered reporting. He targeted CNN journalist Natasha Bertrand, whom he said to be fired.

Im I watched him with fake news for three days, Tr Trump wrote on the real Social. “Should be condemned immediately and then ‘like a dog’ should be thrown.”

Bertrand broke the story of the pre -defense intelligence agency, which was based on four accounts that expanded to seven sources.

Trump, who contained a grudge against Bertrand, from previous stories, accused him of lying and görmek trying to destroy our Patriot pilots by looking bad ”.

CNN said that the network is “100 percent of Natasha Bertrand’s journalism and especially reports of her and her and colleagues”.

“CNN’s reporting clearly revealed that this was a first finding that can change with additional intelligence.