From rules-based order to rule by fear: America’s democratic unravelling

As the Trump Administration weaponizes state power against critics, America’s image as the guardian of the rules-based international order is crumbling in real time, writes Mark Beeson.

FOREIGN AFFAIRS has long been one of the most influential policy journals in the United States.

Important names from both wings of politics Hillary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld And Madeleine Albrightas well as influential academics such as Joseph Nye, Francis Fukuyama And Samuel Huntingtonall have graced its pages and provided a glimpse of the ideas that underpin American foreign policy.

As you might imagine, it’s not that radical. On the contrary, it is often considered as “the sound of that”.blob” or the predominantly liberal policy-making elite who express a rather smug and idealized view of America’s role in international relations. Equally predictably, American power is always positive and “indispensableIt is a force in international relations and plays a central role in maintaining the “rules-based international order”.

This is proof of how much has changed since the second coming of the United States. Donald Trump HE Foreign affairs has quickly evolved into an authoritative and insightful source of criticism of America’s current foreign and domestic policies.

A. new article This work by three highly respected scholars of authoritarian regimes shows not only what a threat the Trump Administration poses to democracy, but also how brave you have to be to point it out in contemporary America.

as Levitsky et al observe:

‘No government, Democratic or Republican, has taken action remotely similar to the Trump Administration’s politicized attacks on critics and opponents.’

It is hardly surprising that many media organizations and individuals choose to self-censor rather than invite retaliation from a government that has little tolerance for other views:

The Trump Administration’s authoritarian assault has perhaps transformed American political life more than many of its critics realize. Individuals and organizations in the United States have changed their behavior, fearing government retribution, cooperating with or quietly acquiescing in authoritarian demands that they would once have rejected or opposed.

The authors detail the harmful impact of Trump’s policies, which have systematically undermined or weaponized key elements of the American political system, including the judiciary and even the military. The result is this: ‘The result of the USA’ The authoritarian turn depends not on the strength of the regime, but on the opposition’s willingness to continue playing a difficult game.

judge by The stagnant nature of Congress and the Supreme CourtIt’s not clear whether democracy can survive, let alone rein in Trump’s authoritarian tendencies. In fact, it is an open question whether midterm elections will be held if Trump thinks he may lose and the political situation is deemed too unstable.

All of this raises important questions that political leaders in this country are powerless to consider, let alone answer. If we have a policy ‘We cooperate as much as we can. and we can’t agree where we should’ When it comes to undemocratic China, why shouldn’t the same logic and criteria apply to relations with authoritarian America?

One of the most striking issues in the shrinking public sphere is the rise of populist authoritarians such as Hungary. Viktor OrbanThe person from whom Trump learned important policy lessons. In fact, Trump wants to use people like Orbán to undermine the European Union and ‘Developing resistance to Europe’s current course‘a position first expressed by the Vice President J.D. Vance when that he told an audience Stunned European officials at the Munich Security Conference “What I worry about is the threat from within… Europe’s retreat from some of its most fundamental values.”.

Given what is happening in the US, this is not only breathtakingly hypocritical, but also evidence of a systematic campaign to undermine European solidarity and their efforts to counter Russian aggression.coalition of the willing” which the Trump Administration has done little to support.

To be fair, Albanian The government gave practical support to Ukraine in its struggle for existence with Russia. And yet, no matter what Trump Administration officials say or do, our government continues to offer uncritical support and billions of dollars of taxpayer money to a country that has exercised unilateral aggression and has shown no remorse about it. violate international law.

But this way Albert Einstein drew attention, “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them do nothing.”. This observation has never seemed more appropriate. If American democracy fails, or if the Trump Administration succeeds in undermining it in Europe, the future of less powerful outposts of liberal democracy like Australia will be lonely at best, existentially fraught at worst.

Canada is subject to much more American bullying than we are, but there are signs that even oldest friends can rethink their priorities when times change. How effective would such actions be if they were supported by the UK, New Zealand and other “Anglosphere” countries like us?

Maybe we can collectively tell our American cousins that something is terribly wrong in their country and that we will have nothing to do with them until they fix it. It seems unlikely, but it worked in South Africa. Although some Trump’s most important supporters While they may not be all that happy about the end of apartheid, they are unlikely to respond well to similar forms of external pressure.

It’s not impossible to imagine other members of the Anglosphere collaborating to send a message to the United States, but it’s impossible to imagine Australia doing so. As a matter of fact, even if the USA invaded Canada, the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense Richard Marles will skillfully remind us why this is vital to our “national interests” and Australian will enthusiastically support such sentiments.

Fortunately, there remain some independent outlets with enough literate readers to support them. It is a useful measure of the political climate in any country.

Mark Beeson is an adjunct professor at the University of Technology Sydney and Griffith University. He was previously Professor of International Politics at the University of Western Australia.

Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.