PoK Protest: Govt Invites Agitators For Talks; Pakistani Establishment Blames ‘External Forces’ | World News

İslamabad: In the midst of Pakistan’s brutal situation in the occupied Kashmir, a few protesters died in expulsion by government forces, Pok Chief Secretary Jammu and Kashmir joint Awami Action Committee (JKACC) leaders, despite the continuation of the installation, shows a notification for negotiations.

In particular, in the call of Jkaac’s central leader Shaukat Nawaz Mir, workers and supporters from all cities and towns of Kashmir (POK), the occupied Pakistan, made a long march towards Muzaffarabad on 1 October.

A complete closure was observed in Kotli region. Since all major entrance and exit roads were blocked by the government forces, seating protests were organized by JKAAC employees.

In Dhirkot, the convoy of approximately 2,000 jkaac workers from Rawalakote and Bagh walked to Muzaffarabad. However, when the police reached Dhirkot, they opened fire on the protesters. It has been reported that four civilians were killed and about 16 people were injured, including civilians and local police personnel during the clashes.

Similarly, a seating protest was organized by about 2,000 people in Lal Chowk in Muzaffarabad against losses in Dhirkot.

However, the protest then shifted to Muzaffarabad Bypass to wait for convoys from other places. Reports showed air ignition and tear gas bombardment by Pakistani security forces. Both civilians were killed there.

In Dadyal, a convoy from Chakswari and Islamgarh from JKAAC workers walked to Muzaffarabad, which was injured by the death of two people and about ten people.

While the death gang in POK passed a dozen sign, the barbaric power used by Pakistani forces against its citizens, while the Pok government’s leading secretary JKAAC released a notification that invited the leaders to negotiates. However, if the POK government was not protested, JKAAC warned the leadership of the leadership.

In particular, the JKAAC workers in London announced a protest on October 2 in front of the Pakistani High Commission in London.

These domestic protests of the pro -Pakistani organization’s social media platforms are ironic that external agencies describe it as handcrafted instead of moving towards a settlement with the affected population.

This narrative of accusing the external forces for their internal turmoil is not new. Historically, the Pakistani organization had a model of blaming every internal turmoil on external powers.

The Tehreek-E-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) uprising was called “Indian sponsor” by the Service Public Relations (ISPR), while the armed rebellion in Balochistan was labeled under the narrative of “fitna-al-Hintustan”.

This reflects the continuation of the tactic of deflection of the organization by extinguishing the accusation.