Police make three arrests during Epping protest

The Court of Appeal was arrested during a protest other than Bell Hotel on Friday after a temporary precautionary measure decision that prevented asylum seekers from being found there.

Essex police said that men were suspected of different crimes – one of the violence disorder, one attacking a police officer, the other for a drink. Two police officers were injured, although not serious.

Vice President Glen Pavelin said that although most of the protesters participated safely, “the right to protest does not contain the right to commit a crime”.

The court decision means that 138 asylum seekers in the hotel will not have to leave until September 12th.

Explaining the decision of the Court of Appeal, Lord Justice Bean said that the first precautionary measure published by the Supreme Court was “seriously defective in principle”.

The EPPING Forest Region Council, which has decided to precaution, says that Bell Hotel will not sue against the use of the Supreme Court.

Essex police said in a statement, until Saturday morning Bell Hotel said they applied a disintegration order for the area around him.

Acc Pavelin added: “My objection to people who want to hear their voices is to do this in a safe and peaceful way.”

EPPING has reached headlines since the protests started outside the hotel in July.

The tension was installed after seeking a shelter living there and Later he is accused of several crimes A 14 -year -old girl included sexual assault.

Police, in connection with the disorder outside the hotel so far 28 arrests, he said.

The protesters gathered outside the hotel with banners and Union Jack and England flags on Friday evening, while the feelings in Hight Street were mixed.

Laura Fraye, who lives in her mother EPPING, thought that the last decision would be “very upset”.

“This is a little embarrassment, but I hope the right decisions and things calm down,” he said.

His mother, Bonny Pitson, said with the protesters he accepted with them, “he will not stand.”

“They are not harmless – not vindictive, they do not harm anyone,” he said.

The girl added: “I think people will protest if they are not heard.”

The EPPING Forest Region Council, ruled by the Conservative, won a temporary measure against the hotel at the beginning of this month, which decided that the asylum seekers could not stay there.

The precautionary measure decision overturned in the appeal court means that migrants may remain.

Kerry Gilroy, who has been living in town for 20 years and runs a Facebook group called EPPING for everyone, said, “My group was really upset and upset by the facts spreading about the asylum seekers – and the asylum seekers.

He continued: “We really wanted to change the narrative and show that people who protested do not represent EPPING. It has been really positive.”

He said that he was satisfied with the last court decision, “It gives them consistency for the people in the hotel, but it made me very tense because I think it would be a problem … But the mafia rule was not allowed to take over”.

He felt that the Council was following the allegations that the Council had clashed with the workers’ government and “spending money”.

“These people hear their case and finally the hotel will be empty.”

EPPING WEST’s conservative councilor Holly Whitbread, Friday’s news “deeply disappointing and will feel like a betrayal for many,” he said.

“The Council decided to use every legal and diplomatic route we can do from the first day.” He said.

“We get advice on what else we can do,” he added.

29 -year -old EPPING HEAD OFFICE SONNIE MEAD, the final decision “people can put aside a little – a strange time and a strange world we live in,” he said.

He had mixed feelings and just wanted everyone to feel safe.

“I’m a little confused about the fact that asylum seekers are here.” He said.

“I don’t think the people in EPPING will be very pleased.” He said.

Some have expressed disappointment on the new decision.

A woman said: “I do not agree with our own people before looking at others – they are homeless to our old soldiers and everyone, so benefit them.”

Steve Turvey 36, said this is “completely unfair – all protests – I think they are [asylum seekers] He deserves to be here, he has the right to be here, and I think everyone here is disgusting – he jumped like a bandwagon “.

His partner Sarah said: “I think the ongoing struggle and how great EPPING is really sad.”

Mr. Turvey added: “Not good – but I don’t know what the answer is.”

In mid -October, a full Supreme Court is expected to decide for a permanent precautionary precautionary decision for the bell.

Following Friday’s decision underlined He wants to close the asylum hotels “regularly” while he says he’s trying to alleviate the pressure on the system.