Questions to Google go unanswered

Exposé – Australia’s attempt to use Google and Meta’s news content, as well as governments around the world to do the same thing – combining the points in the wars around the world to allow the giants to pay. However, there are a series of questions that remain unanswered with the office of Google, News Corp Australia and the assistant treasurer Daniel Mulino.

It was reported with our partners from Indonesia, Canada and Brazil, Ciikey’s Story spoke to multiple former Google executives and announced how News Corp Australia’s support for politics was used as a scary tactical abroad by technology giants. In addition, we have explained that some publishers abroad are afraid of language in the contracts signed with Google, and that the technology company could allow the technology to use their stories to train AI bots.

Before the broadcast, our reporting partners Agência Pública, Clip and Lighthouse reports sent a detailed question list to Google. In contrast, they received a statement with two sentences.

Crirase In addition, Labour’s new media negotiation policy, the Deputy Treasurer Mulino and News Corp Australia’ya reached, but so far we have not heard from both.

Today, we publish the questions we ask Google about our bargaining code stories.

• The Google News Showcase Articles in the contracts examined by this investigation affect some rights of the signing news organizations: [that] Discussing the details of agreements with other news organizations and restricting the capacity to coordinate an industrial approach; Publishers acknowledges that the traffic that Google sends to the online features of Google is enough for the publishers’ publishers in connection with automatic reference services for Google’s index, screen and other similar content uses ;; [and] Another article may terminate the contract if a law may terminate the contract if a law is passed to establish a payment mechanism, or if the publisher makes a legal request or complaint about the use of the news content of Google or its affiliates, it follows other copyright payments in the courts ”.
• We noticed many parallels about how Google resisted the news media bargaining legislation in Brazil, Australia, Canada, the United States and Indonesia. An old employee called it the “play book.” Is there a series of strategies or “play books ğı that Google uses to respond to such arrangements?
• Google has chosen the Canadian Journalism Collective to distribute 100 million dollars of funds for the news in Canada?
• Why did you create the Google News initiative? How can Google shareholders benefit from such a program? How do you respond to the accusation that the media is an attempt to “corporate capture”?
• Did Google deliberately organize Newsgeist activities in countries where the company faces regulatory pressure on the media?
• During the legislative process in Canada, Google claimed that Bill C-18 would be disadvantageous with smaller sales points. However, groups such as the National Ethnic Medicine and Canadian Press Council claim that smaller publishers are often ignored by Google for financing. What is your response to this claim?
• Inside Australia– CanadaAnd Brazil, MPs, described their threats to remove the regulatory debates as a strategy to stop the debate. Is this a correct explanation of what happened, and if not, how do you define Google actions?
• Google will stop giving notice in various regions, including California, where Google has prevented the content of California -based news organizations for some state residents in 2024. Can you comment on this result?
• What was his role in shaping the public policy of Vice President Richard Gingras in favor of Google’s interests for news from 2017 to the beginning of this year?
• Was Google news showcases a direct response to Google’s regulatory edition?
• How does Google choose Google News Showcase which publishers to sign?
• What do you do from the claims of critics that create financial addiction for news organizations?
• Why did these provisions attached? Our sources claim that these substances are pushed to give up other rights while the showcase is joined. Is this a correct explanation? If not, can you explain why you put such restrictive substances?
• Are these articles in contracts around the world or from country to country?
• After the investigation of Germany’s federal competition regulator Bundeskartellamt, some provisions of the showcase contracts should be changed in Germany, but they are still used in other countries. How do you explain this inconsistency?
• Some experts, another substance in the showcase contracts [which] Google “offers the ability to publish, distribute, open to publicly, open to public, and use the ability to pay for the AI ​​training. What is your answer to this?
• Does Google plan to sign other news licensing agreements for AI training?
• Research from Muckrac A significant amount of AI recommends that the content of the view is due to news publishers. To what extent has Google used news content for educational purposes so far?
• A new study by the Swiss Economic Consulting Company Fehradvice found that the inclusion of journalism in the search results helps to contribute to the topicality, trust and integrity of Google’s proposals in Germany. On average, it concluded that journalism content increases Google’s value by 24%. A study before the same company found that the perceived search in Switzerland has increased with the addition of 16%of the news. This is a significant contrast with your findings. LAST EXPLANATIONS. Did such economic studies have led to changes in your policy of news?
• What did Karan Bhatiia, the President of Google’s Government and Public Policy, discuss with Australian US Ambassador Kevin Rudd during his meetings on March 3, 2025?

Description: News Media as part of the bargaining code, private media (parent company Crirase) He bought meta and Google from the middle of 2021. Meta terminated its agreements with all publishers in 2024. Private media continues to receive funds from Google as part of the code.