No matter the spots, the Liberal leopard remains the same

Despite the calls for reform, the main purpose of the liberal party – to serve elite interests through fear and division – remains unchanged.

There is no doubt that Labour’s historical election victory in May would accept that some party should change if some party is re -elected in the Liberal Party. Under Sussan LeyLeadership seems to be nothing changes. This raises this question: Can a leopard point change? And why would it want if a leopard was no longer a leopard?

A lot of analysis was conducted after the election about what caused the loss of landslide by the liberal party, and the former liberals point to the failures of the party to represent various Australia. For example, ABC reported Young people do not connect with the policies of the party. Saturday veteran And ABC He also pointed out the problem because the liberal party is not sufficiently represented by female voters, especially women’s liberal party’s federal and state ranks. SBS reported That the Liberal Party has not established a connection with multicultural Australia.

All of this focuses on how different the appearance of the liberal party looks, and is much less relevant than the policies that the party wants to surrender to society. Obviously, if they continue to do what they always do, what is the meaning of having more young, more women and a more cultured liberal party: to serve the interests of many of them?

This is the basis of the liberal party’s selection problem. Their problems are not that they seem to be representative from marketing and to improve how they offer themselves to the public. The problem is that its policies need to represent the interests of mass voters. Since the liberal party leopard exists to serve the interests of the capitalist elites, dealing with its points will not change it.

The liberal party has always existed to serve distinguished interests at the expense of masses. It is a historical fact that the liberal party is specifically established to compete with the Labor Party as a voter and to weaken the political ambitions of the Labor Movement. Nothing has changed in this respect.

This fact is the reason why liberals focus on how the analysis of the most of the media and the analysis of most of the media focuses on how the liberals present themselves to the public and how it does not present it to the party’s article and policies. Raison d’être. They don’t want to talk about what they can’t change their goals, because to admit it, admitting that their problems are not seen in skin depth.

Consider the important policy of the climate action. Old pm Scott Morrison He went out of the office in 2022, and an entire patch of liberal moderates lost his metropolitan seats to treat the independents, and voters punished the liberals for decades to do climate action for decades.

There was a simple solution for liberals to solve this choice problem. They can change their attitudes towards climate action. So why, why the old leader Peter DuttonDoesn’t liberals take it? Simple. Liberals do not represent the interests of the people in protection from the catastrophic effect of a climate that warms the planet. Liberals defend and protect the interests of large oil and fossil fuel billionaires.

In the past, there are moderate liberals who seem to have strong convictions on climate action – imagine Malcolm Turnbull And Matt Kean – Ultimately, he won the denial and delay defenders in the climate. This liberal opposition in the climate action reflects the need to keep billionaire-coal-baron-loving citizens in voting coalitions, because they will never win the government without citizen seats.

Therefore, although election problems worsening in 2025, Ley will not change The opposition for decades to the climate action of liberals.

When the liberals provide policies to be popular among the masses, they are not to improve the welfare network, health system or the conditions and wages of workers, but quite middle class welfare. These policies are not intended to solve the inequality of wealth or the structural problems of the society, but rather use election bribes such as tax cuts for high -income winners (a largely irresponsible policy that hurts retirement income) and more, more, more A new suggestion These private school fees should be deducted from tax.

The reason why the liberals resort to the middle-class bribery is that they do not serve the interests of the masses and thus claim that they do only during the election periods.

It explains their historical confidence in the campaigns of these liberals, who want to serve a few people, but need the votes of the masses-in the form of division, fear, hatred, culture war, intellectualism and scientific anti-science campaigns, often supported by misleading and true claims.

These toxic and bad political fear campaigns represent the things that are established to make the liberal party: to weaken the Labor Party’s chances of election.

Let the liberals fight Labour at a carbon price (Sky News Host Peta credlin accepted Not carbon tax); A ugly, aggressive and deceptive campaign against Dutton’s indigenous parliament (manipulative and counterfeit accusations to break fear and confusion; Liberals Labor Party’s credit changes branding Retirement tax (All retirees scare them to think that they affect them when they do not do); The Labor Party proposes something progressive to provoke a liberal fear campaign against him, and that is what the liberals should do. Their meaning.

The commitment to trust the liberals indeed the fear campaign and the struggle of the cultural was repeated by the new leader Sussan Ley. Among all the conversations that needed to change the party, Ley was asked by Karen Barlow. Saturday veteran Whether the liberals will end the cultural wars, such as welcome to the country ceremonies. Ley refused to ignore them, “Always be a feature of the Australian view”.

The support of liberals continued to this cultural war was evident in the first week of parliament according to the election. Ley had the opportunity to show where he was standing in such matters when he became a senator. Pauline Hanson And the only nation -extremist senators disrespectful He turned his backs Upon the adoption of the country in the Senate. Ley showed his devotion to a nation by saying anything.

The liberals will not change. If the liberals adopted policies such as the climate action that was good for the masses but challenged the profit of billionaire fossil fuel interests, and stopping using fear and division campaigns to weaken the Labor Party, the liberal party would no longer have any meaning.

The liberals exist to weaken labor in order not to be the Labor Party. Therefore, there is no intention of changing the points or essence of the liberal leopard. No matter how much they are, the liberals cannot change the cause of their existence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yr4pk1bga_q

Dr Victoria Fielding is an independent Australian columnist. You can follow him on the yarns @Drvicfielding or bluesky @drvicfield.bsky.social.

Support independent journalism subscribe to IA.