SAP Wins Early Round in US Legal Fight With Celonis

In a lawsuit filed in the USA, he won an early tour by one of the most valuable attempts accusing the German technology giant with the market power illegally.

On Monday, a federal judge in San Francisco rejected Antitröst allegations that Celonis SE had prevented access to data in his systems to provide an unfair advantage to his Signavio unit. Judge said Celonis could try to review and refill the allegations.

Celonis and Signavio offer process mining software to find inefficiency in business institutional systems and eliminate them. S is the world’s largest seller for corporate resource planning software, including book holding and supply solutions.

Companies did not respond immediately to the request for comments.

After organizing a hearing a week ago and talked about how the judge aims to manage, Celonis spokesman said he was pleased that the company’s allegations of intervention will progress through E -Posta. “We believe that businesses should have the freedom to choose the best technology solutions without“ intervention, misinformation or unjust restrictions ,, Celonis said that Celonis would continue to defend these principles.

The S spokesman said that “S continues to reject Celonis’s allegations” and S will “continue to defend violently”.

US Regional Judge Vince Chhabria allowed him to claim to intervene in the contract -related relations and said that the pre -hearing known as Discovery could start immediately.

In his decision, Chhabria claimed that Celonis’s behavior causes his behavior to think that more than one Celonis customer does not renew his contracts, and that Celonis required to secure these customers to prevent them from doing so ”. The judge said it was “a reasonable deduction in Celonis’s contracted relations”.

William Kovacic, a law professor at the University of George Washington, said Celonis tested a new theory of antitröst.

“A theory of damage developed by the courts that is not generally accepted by the courts and the freedom to do what they want to dominant firms, a theory of damage developed to overcome the previous case -law.”

CASE CELONİS SE / S SE, 3: 25-CV-02519, USA Regional Court, Northern California Region.

This article was created from an automatic news agency feeding without changing the text.