Trump administration’s lawsuit against all of Maryland’s federal judges meets skepticism in court

BALTIMORE (AP) – On Wednesday, a judge questioned why the Trump administration was necessary. Sue Maryland’s entire federal bench On an order that stops the immediate deportation of immigrants who challenge their deportation.
US Regional Judge Thomas Cullen did not make a decision after the hearing in the federal court in Baltimore, but Maryland judges ‘lawyers’ lawyers called the extraordinary legal maneuver expressed.
Cullen is working in the western region of Virginia, but it touched to supervise the Baltimore case, because all Maryland’s 15 federal judges were called the defendants, which is extremely unusual that reflects the aggressive reaction of the Republic Administration to the courts, slow or stop your policies.
In question in the case President Maryland is an order that prevented the immigrants from the deportation of immigrants who reviewed the detention of the administration in a Maryland Federal Court by the regional judge George L. Russell III. The order prevents the removal of Habeas Corpus petitions until 16:00 on the second working day after opening.
The Ministry of Justice, who filed the case in June, the Head of the Head of Automatic Pause Donald Trump’s The authority to apply immigration laws.
However, for the judges of Maryland, lawyers claim that the case aims to limit the power of the judiciary to review certain migration procedures. Agenda of Out of A mass deportation.
Paul Clement, a leading conservative lawyer who served as the general of Republican President George W. Bush, said, “The executive branch aims to file a lawsuit against a joint government branch on behalf of the United States.” “This team really has no pioneer”
Clement has listed a few more ways that the administration could take to question the order, such as applying for appeal in an individual Habeas case.
Cullen also asked the government’s lawyers whether they thought about the alternative that he said he could be faster than suing all judges. In addition, the administration questioned what would happen when it accelerates its current approach and sued a federal Bank, even to the Supreme Court.
“I think you’ve got the fact that it’s probably my skepticism, Cul Cullen said Ministry of Justice Attorney Elizabeth Themins fence when he stops to present the case of the Trump administration.
Hedges rejected the case that the case would “open its flood gates”. The authority said the government wanted to relax from a legal barricade that prevents effective immigration sanctions.
“The United States is a plaintiff here because the United States is being damaged,” he said.
Cullen, who was nominated by Trump in 2019 by Trump, said he would make a decision. Labor Day whether or not to reject the case. If it is allowed to continue, it may prevent the government’s request for a preliminary measures to prevent the Maryland Federal Counter, and to follow the conditions of the order of the judge.
He tried to maintain the automatic pause in deportation transactions, existing conditions and the court’s potential judicial authority, allowing immigrant petitions to participate in court procedures and access lawyers and give the government the opportunity to argument arguments and presentations in his defense.
Rusell also said that the court received a Habeas petition flow, which resulted in a hurry and annoying trials in having a difficult and concrete information about the place and status of the petitions. Habeas petitions allow people to challenge their arrest by the government.
The administration accused Maryland judges of giving priority to a regular program, saying that in the court documents “a sense of disappointment and more comfort does not give the defendants a license to change the law”.
Among the judges mentioned in the case Paula XinisWho was deported illegally Kilmar Abrego Garcia In March, El Salvador – a lawsuit that quickly became a glare point in Trump’s immigration edition. Abrego Garcia was made at a bad -fame Salvadoran Megaprison, which he claimed to have been beaten and tortured.
The administration then brought Abrego Garcia back to the US and accused her of human trafficking in Tennessee. His lawyers described the accusation as an attempt to justify the extraordinary deportation. Recently xinis banned management If he is released from the prison waiting for Abrego Garcia from prison, he immediately took him to custody.