Congress submitted 89 lakh complaints to EC during SIR, all rejected, claims Pawan Khera
Claiming that irregularities doubt the intention of EC, Khera asked all the exercise to be done again.
However, the Biha Chief Election Officer Office claimed that no Blas, authorized by any regional president of the Congress of the Congress of the Congress of Bihar, has not made any requests or objections about any deleted name.
“EC continues to receive news that there has been no complaints from any political party. The truth is that 89 lakh complaints about the irregularities in Sir.” He said.
“When our Blas went to the files to file complaints, complaints were rejected by EC. EC Categorically, the complaints to our Blas, not by political parties, but only by individuals,” he said.
The Congress demands that the entire secret exercise be re -accepted, and added that the “large -scale irregularities in the Secret have created a doubt about the intentions of the horse. “Our BLOS said that the voters of the voters who have been deleted and all applications are in question. Bihar voters were erased by EC from the 90,540 stand in the state.
25 Lakh voters were deleted due to migration, while the names of 22 Lakh people were removed because they were not alive. The authority said that the names of 9.70,000 voters were deleted because they are not in the addresses given.
Khera, “the number of cabins where more than 100 names are erased 20.368 and more than 200 names are deleted in the number of cabins 1.
Authority added that more than 75 percent of the names deleted in the immigrant category are 635 stands, and that it is very important to verify these figures.
Khera claimed that there were many cases where two epics were given to a single voter.
“We also have receipts and now this fact cannot be rejected. We hope that the data we provide will be verified by EC and will make an investigation about it. There is a need to verify the door to the door to correct these mistakes.”
However, the Chief Election Officer’s Office, “To date, no Blas the National Congress of the Indian National Congress in Bihar, any regional president, no name published on August 1 (Form 6) or objection (Form 7) has not given any name published in the format,” he rejected the accusations.
On the allegations of reiterating voters in the draft rollers, CEO’s office said in a statement that the existing drafts published under the secret were not certain.
“He was clearly designed for public investigations inviting allegations and objections from voters, political parties and all other stakeholders.” He said.
It cannot be interpreted as a “final error” or “illegal incorporation” as it provides a remedy by the election registration officials (EROS) by the election registration officials (EROS).
67.826 “suspicious copies” specified in certain parts of the media is based on data mining and name/relative/age combinations based on subjective matching.
“These parameters cannot prove the reproduction without verification of documentaries and fields. In Bihar, especially in rural voters, it is common for more than one person to share the same names, parent names and similar ages. He said.
If the CEO office is demographically similar inputs, they are determined and removed during the request and objection.
In such cases, “All stakeholders can inform the election registration officer, submit their objections, and take necessary measures. On ECI’s singularization mechanism, Eronet 2.0 software uses the demographically similar inputs that mark possible copies.
In the CEO’s statement, just to give a dream number one on a fictitious basis, he said he didn’t correctly create any reality.
As a reliable and reliable news source“The existence of some temporary recurring entries in the draft roll does not invalidate the sir exercise,” he said.
