google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
UK

Southport attack: ‘catastrophic’ failures by multiple agencies contributed to atrocity, public inquiry finds – live updates | Southport attack

Southport attack blamed on ‘catastrophic’ failures of institutions and killer’s ‘irresponsible’ parents

Josh Halliday

A damning investigation found Axel Rudakubana was able to carry out the Southport atrocity because of the “catastrophic” failures of multiple institutions and the “irresponsible and harmful” role of his parents.

Sir Adrian Fulford condemned the “inappropriate merry-go-round” of government agencies taking responsibility and their “frankly demoralizing” refusal to accept responsibility, saying: “This culture needs to end.”

The murder of three teenage girls – 6-year-old Bebe King, 9-year-old Alice da Silva Aguiar and 7-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe – and the stabbing of 10 others was not “a bolt of lightning from a clear blue sky”, the head of the inquiry said.

He added: “Instead, a form of serious violence…was clearly, repeatedly and unmistakably marked over the years.

“In fact, many professionals in direct contact [Rudakubana] “He expressed serious fears, sometimes in harsh terms, that he would harm or kill.”

Rudakubana was sentenced to life imprisonment last year following his violent attack on teenage girls at a Taylor Swift-themed holiday club in the Merseyside town on July 29, 2024.

To share

important events

Victims’ lawyers say state failed to learn from Southport shooting

Josh Halliday

Josh Halliday

Lawyers for victims of the brutality said ministers had “failed to learn the lessons” of the Southport attack and allowed young people obsessed with violence to remain a “catastrophic” threat to society, ahead of the findings of an official inquiry.

Judge Sir Adrian Fulford’s report into the July 2024 attack, to be published on Monday, is expected to strongly criticize the failings of a number of institutions, including the counter-terrorism program Prevent.

Killer Axel Rudakubana was referred to Prevent three times, but concerns were ignored, in part because he did not express a clear ideology.

Counterterrorism officials have since vowed that people who are not clearly motivated by jihadism or other beliefs will now pass through Prevent if they have an apparent obsession with extreme violence, such as Rudakubana.

But the Guardian analysis found that of 3,400 cases highlighting these concerns in children and young people, only one in 10 received anti-radicalisation support by March 2025.

Chris Walker, lawyer for the families of the three murdered girls – Bebe King, 6, Elsie Dot Stancombe, 7, and Alice da Silva Aguiar, 9 – said the system was “not fit for purpose and needs to undergo fundamental changes to reduce serious risks to society”.

To share

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button