Starmer’s fury over Afghan data breach as he warns Tories ‘have questions to answer’
Sir Keir Starmer, no one encountered a huge blunder action on the risk of 100,000 Afghan’s life at risk of disaster data violation ventilated his anger.
The Prime Minister said that the leak should never be realized and that the day after the abolition of an unprecedented sutergivity of the ministers of TORY, he had “serious questions to answer”.
Sir Ben Wallace, a defense secretary, said that a MOD official received full responsibility for the leak when he published an electronic picture containing 18,000 Afghan name “inaccurate”.
However, in his call for more investigations, questions about why no one was fired on the violation of the risk of causing the life of those who have connected to the UK forces, which are dangerous to retaliation from the Taliban, came up.
A powerful Commons Committee president comes because he wrote to the Information Commissioner Office (ICO) and has been pressing for rethinking to rethink the violations of Billions of Billions of Billions of Costs in Moving Afghan to the UK, which has been affected by thousands of taxpayers to the taxpayer.
At the beginning of the questions of a tense Prime Minister, Sir Keir expressed his anger and said the deputies: ız We warned the opposition about the conservative administration of this policy and revealed all the failures we have inherited: a great data violation, a supersergivity, a secret route that cost hundreds of million pounds.
“The ministers who work under the opposite party have serious questions about how this is allowed.”
The Minister suggested that the Conservatives should “welcome” from the Commons Defense Committee, which promised to investigate.
A few hours later, in a dramatic intervention, former right -wing Minister of Interior Minister Suella Braverman said that there were divisions about how to deal with the Violation in the Torah government, and that he was against the new secret route established to bring the Superinjunction, and that he was against the British government.
In the Scathing statement, Mrs. Braverman condemned the former Torah government, and then led by Rishi Altak, where she played an important role before her dismissal by the former Prime Minister.
He said: “Both the ministers and the authorities have much more to say about the execution of the mode, and the House of Commons is right to do this. I hope we have the opportunity soon.
“What happens is ugly and never again. Therefore, we must be very clear about what and how it is.
“The scope was wrong, Superinjunction was wrong, and not to stop unwanted mass migration. So I’m sorry: Conservative government failed you and disappointed the leaders. Then it wasn’t good enough.
Former Defense Secretary Sir Grant Shapps and former Armed Forces Minister James Heappey, who controlled the covering, have been contacted for the comment, but none of them were silent in the violation.
Defense Secretary John Healey, who called for more investigations about the violation, confessed that information is uncomfortable with the way of handling for three years, “accountability begins now”.
The Commons Defense Committee confirmed that it would launch its own investigation and Dame Chi Onwurah, President of the Commons Science Innovation and Technology Committee, is suppressing the information commissioner for an investigation.
The Information Commissioner has previously refused to conduct his own investigation, although he had a fine of £ 305,000 for a much smaller mod data violation.
Dame Chi said Independent: “A leak of this size, of course, the fact that it takes place at the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Defense brings the additional dimension of security concerns. Defense Election Committee Office [ICO] He will undertake a complete investigation. In the meantime, I will write to the information commissioner to ask for more details about the role of his office in this case. “
Jon Baines, a senior data protection expert in Mishcon de Reya, was surprised by the commissioner’s attitude towards violation.
He said: “I haven’t seen it unanimously from the data protection interpretation of ICO’s lack of attention.
“There is a potential argument that he has no meaning in a great fines when he will punish the public wallet against Mode.
“The application is not only about fines. The information commissioner has the power to put a report before Parliament. I have been hitting the secret data subject in electronic statements for years, and if I were a commissioner, I was thinking about how I could bring the problem to the agenda.
“A report before the parliament would make them promote, bring the issue to the agenda and take over the parliament.”
ICO did not answer IndependentRequest for a comment.
Meanwhile, a member of the Defense Election Committee warned against the name and shaping of the individual responsible for the violation and said that the committee should look at the government’s failure instead.
Confiring that the committee will initiate an investigation, President Labor Deputy Tan Dhesesi, BBC Radio 4s told In one of the world Program: “We want to reach the bottom of those who have been on behalf of the parliament who has been from the beginning for a long time.”
“Ultimately, I think the fact that there is no parliamentary investigation, no one is taken into account on this issue is not clear at all.”
When the Allied forces were swept into power in 2021, Leyton and Wanstead Labor Party deputy Calvin Bailey called for “appropriate examination” on this issue.
He said: ız We should go back and make an investigation in accordance with everything, not only data violation, all cultural management and surveillance of operation, recovery, foreign policy and military participation and participation.
“We will probably see that people work under pressure and pressure, because there were very few people to deal with the crisis.”
The authority warned that the Defense Committee has been “the best placed in the best way to do the necessary work” as a full public investigation of a public investigation.
