India initiates anti-dumping probe into import of solar cell component, mobile covers from China
The new Delhi launched a solar component from China and an anti-Damping probe against the import of mobile caps, following the complaints of the 29 Sep (PTI) Ministry of Commerce, ARM DGTR, Renewsys India and all India Mobile Cover Producer Association.
The applicant claimed that the industry was influenced by China due to fallen imports, except solar Encapsulants “except solar energy capsules”.
The item is used in the production of solar PV modules.
“Authority is launching an anti-dumping investigation to determine the existence, degree and effect of the dumps on this occasion,” on a statement on Monday. He said.
If it is found that casting causes material injury in domestic players, DGTR will recommend the application of the tax.
The Ministry of Finance makes a final decision to impose the task.
Anti-dumping probes are carried out by countries to determine whether domestic industries have been injured due to the increase in cheap imports.
As a counter precaution, they impose these tasks under the multilateral regime of the Geneva -based World Trade Organization (WTO). The task aims to provide fair trade practices for domestic producers against foreign producers and exporters and to create a flat playground.
India and these countries are members of the WTO.
India has applied anti-dumping tasks to various products to deal with cheap imports from various countries, including China.
In a separate notification, DGTR said that he launched an investigation of a balance task on the imports of “Net Flash Glass” imported from Malaysia and Indonesia.
An application on this subject was presented by Sisecam Flat Glass India Pvt Ltd, Gold Plus Glass Industry, Gold Plus Float Glass and Saint-Gobain India.
These applicants requested investigations.
“The authority determines that the presence of appropriate subsidies against the production and exports of the goods in the country in question is proof of prima disaster and that such subsidized imports cause material injuries in the indigenous sector through volume and price effects.”
“Authority is enough to determine the existence, degree and effect of the resident subsidies as a result of the alleged subsidies, and if it is removed, it will be sufficient to raise the injury to the domestic sector.”
