Telangana HC Quashes Rape Case, Says Relationship Consensual

Haydarabad: Juvadi Sridevi, the Supreme Court of TaLangana, claimed that the relationship between the complainant and the defendant seems to be consent and the allegations did not require the continuation of the trial. Judge T. Ranjith felt a crime petition opened by Tankappan. According to the prosecutor’s office, the actual complaint, a graduate student, claimed that the petition caused sexual intercourse under the promise of marriage after divorce his wife. He claimed that the petition later pulled his promise and took him out of the house. The petition argued that the relationship is based on consent and that there was an unexplained delay in the file of the complaint. The petition lawyer argued that the complainant had a model of making similar claims by pointing to a previous case against another person broken by the Supreme Court. Based on the APEX Court’s decision, the petition lawyer claimed that they would not mean rape, even if the allegations were completely accepted. It concluded that the continuation of the trial would mean that the proceedings of the legal process would mean the abuse of the legal process, noting that the previous live relationship is not present in the firing of the fir and the promise of marriage with the intention of marriage. Accordingly, the judge filed a criminal case against the petition.

Forest Land: HC Spikes Farmers Plea

Justice of the Supreme Court of TaLangana, Nagesh Bheemapaka rejected a writing defense by a group of landless farmers who challenged the cancellation of land assignments because it belongs to the land forest department and was wrongly appointed by the Revenue Department. The judge, a writer opened by Amrutha, and 13 other people, challenged the procedures published by the Revenue Department (RDO), who canceled Bhuttapur’s 15 acres and two Guntas agricultural land appointments. The petitions belonging to the back and planned communities claimed that they were appointed to the land in 1999 after they were found appropriate by the Adilabad Region and claimed that they were under planting since then. They claimed that they were given part books and title works and that they were under good faith that the previous cancellation procedures initiated in 2000 were reduced. Forest Department previously revenue officials, the appointed land of the EP Forest Law dated 1967 was part of the forest land reported in accordance with the 4th part of the Forest Law. In 2000, a joint review led to a proposal for cancellation in 2002, and in 2009, RDO’s canceled principle, a principle of justice, a principle of justice, a principle of justice, was reported because they did not turn to justice. hearing. The judge could not find any value in this discussion. The judge explained that the declaration was submitted and that the joint collector Adilabad Region refused to accept the declarations of petitions and required its loyalty to houses. The judge said that the plaintiff did not take into account the socio-economic effect of the plaintiff on appropriate appointed persons while remaining the legality of cancellation. Although the Cancellation corrected the previous illegal one by the Income Department, the authorities observed that the authorities were obliged to make a living of the affected appointed. The judge, the defendant directed the suitability of the petitions for the new appointment of similar lands in Bhuttapore or nearby villages and to give appropriate orders.

Hearing the case on the HC PWD quota

Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao of the Supreme Court of TaLangana received a case of writing that objected to the ineffectiveness of unmissable tasks between three to four percent of promotions for disabled people for disabled people. The judge, Central Personnel and Training Department (DOPT) published by the office memorandums, despite the open directions, defendant officials, for officials for the promotions of 4 percent of the reservation application allegedly allegedly can not apply the application of Hanamkonda, the regional tb control office was opened by the senior assistant. He claimed that the unmoved empty positions between the four disabled categories were not compulsory by the OMS and decisions of the Supreme Court. The petition owner claimed that the lack of this kind of practice was looking for instructions for the expansion of the reservation with the retrospective effect of the reservation and the promotion of the equivalent under the equivalent quota. The judge directed the participants to respond and issued the case for more hearing.

CBSE School: Plea

Justice K. Lakshman from the Supreme Court of TaLangana made a writing that violated CBSE regulations and challenged the application of the provisions of the Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) of the children’s Free and Compulsory Education (RTE). Judge, Joshua heard a petition opened by a student, Joshua, a petition opened by a student, a government employee, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government, a government He felt a petition opened. Although the school is connected to CBSE, Ncert claimed that he did not compulsızing textbooks. The petition will claim that the school prescribes special publications by violating the Constitution. In addition to the petition, he sought a direction to implement the exclusive use of ncert materials in CBSE schools, and the Judge called for the CBSE to direct the CBSE to initiate a penalty against the school under his statutes, including the tax of 5 Lakh, which will be paid to the Supreme Court of Legal Services Institution. The judge directed the participants to receive instructions.