‘Toothless’ laws will fail to protect children from grooming gangs | Politics | News

The laws of flagship will be “ineffective, because of sexual abuse and grooming gangs, because the government refuses to implement them and warned a damn investigation. Anyone working with children will have a legal duty to explain to the police or local councils if they suspect that a child sex crime is committed under the new legislation. However, the government rejected calls not to comply with a criminal offense.

Instead, it is forbidden to work with children in the future – and this is not even guaranteed. An investigation on Monday warned that measures may not be enough to do effective protection against child sexual abuse ”.

In a report of the Parliament’s Joint Human Rights Committee, the government said that the government should rethink the result of complying with the task of reporting child sexual abuse, thus working as an effective deterrent ”.

And workers’ deputy Rachael Maskell said: “Accounting is the center of an effective protection, so if children are kept safe, solid measures are very important to ensure compulsory reporting. Human rights joint committee should be heard and their suggestions should be followed.”

Professor Alexis Jay, led by Jay, warned the independent investigation into sexual abuse, in 2022, warned about the “global crisis ve and said that 3.1 million adults in England and Wales had sexual abuse before the age of 16. Children and people working, sexual abuse or account signs from the victims to be obliged to report and “Saidin should be the crime,” he said.

Barones Louise Casey’s Gangs Scandal was an urgency after an investigation into the scandal.

However, while the government brought a legal task as part of the crime and police bill, he refused to impose criminal sanctions on the grounds that it would deterre people working with children.

Instead, those who are not compatible, people who are not allowed to work with children can be placed on a list held by DBS (DBS).

The report on Monday warns: “Even if a guidance does a referral and the DBS is satisfied with the fact that an individual does not comply with the reporting task, the DBS will not have to add it to the rod list unless he concludes that it is ‘appropriate’.

“Although it makes sense to give DBS some discretionary authority for exceptional situations, this is not a result of a person who does not comply with the duty of reporting suspicion of sexual abuse, even if they are being referred to DBS.”

Lord David Alton, the chairman of the committee, said: uz We are concerned that the child’s sexual abuse may have to go further.

“For those who do not perform their duties and report these terrible crimes, they may be ineffective without repercussions.

The investigation also warned that employers and managers would be reluctant to report concerns about staff or colleagues because they could harm their reputation.

Professor Jay, who said that a new legal task was necessary, heard the investigation from survivors of more than 7,000 abuse – many of them reported what happened and ignored.

Professor Jay said: şey What we heard has the courage to talk to someone, but the abuse did not stop. They believed that this adult would do anything and did nothing. These children must be destructive. ”

The campaign group task now drew attention to the fact that it is a certain crime to be able to report suspicions of money laundering, but that the child could not report sexual abuse under the proposed legislation.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Interior: “The promotion of compulsory reporting in the UK will show an important step in strengthening our child protection and will protect systems by creating a culture of openness and honesty instead of covering up and covering up.

“We also bring a new criminal offense to prevent an individual from making a report within the scope of this task. This crime will be punished with a custody penalty for up to seven years.”

Dame Diana Johnson, who explained why the government opposed a criminal sanctions because he could not report doubts, said in June: “The government does not think that it would be proportional to providing a criminal sanction that may accidentally create a creepy effect on those who want to volunteer with children or enter certain professions.”

The National Secular Society has warned the legislation as the “lack of teeth ılan which is currently proposed.

The draft crime and police were discussed in the House of Commons and will be discussed in the House of Lords.