Trump again asks supreme court to end protections for Venezuelans in US | US immigration
The Trump Administration asked the US Supreme Court to intervene for the second time in a case of former President Joe Biden, who was given to hundreds of thousands of Venezüelllu in the United States on Friday, to end the deportation protection of deportation.
The Ministry of Justice made an emergency application for a federal judge, one of the justice, who wanted to abolish the decision to terminate his protection for Venezuelalis under the temporary protected status or TPS program of the internal security secretary.
The Ministry of Justice, “As long as the order of the Regional Court is in force, the secretary needs to allow more than 300,000 Venezuela citizens to remain in the country, despite the determination to do so temporarily ‘is contrary to national interests’,” he said.
Supremecourt was previously ruled to raise a temporary order of US Judge Edward Chen in San Francisco, which was previously published in May, which stopped the termination of the TPS while the case was played in court.
On September 5, Chen made a final decision in the case that found that Noem’s program termination actions violated a federal law that manages the actions of federal agencies.
Trump made a central board of the second White House period for legal and illegal migration, and expanded the pool of those who deported possible, and began to rob certain immigrants of temporary legal guards.
The TPS program is a humanitarian assignment for countries dealing with war, natural disaster or other disasters, which provides access to buyers and work permits in US deportation protection.
Biden determined Venezuela for TPS in 2021 and 2023. Just a few days before Trump’s return to office, Biden’s administration announced an extension of his status.
Noem canceled the extension and took action to end the TPS assignment for a subset of Venezueliyans who benefited from the 2023 appointment.
“This case is familiar with the court and the orders of the sub -courts on the emergency discs of the sub -courts, and it includes the fact that it is increasingly familiar and unsettled,” he said.
Some sub -courts have expressed confusion and disappointment in recent weeks while trying to follow the emergency decisions of the Supreme Court that sometimes arrived with little reasoning or who came with no one.
