Trump urges nuclear talks as U.S.–Iran tensions escalate

Imran Khalid reveals Donald Trump’s objection to nuclear negotiations with Iran at the center of his administration’s foreign policy.

For clear reasons, in this kind of tired epic of the US-Iran relations, the president Donald Trump‘S letter To Iran’s supreme leader Ayatullah Ali KhaneiIt was the last bending of a long drama that has been going on for a long time.

The letter Trump described as an appeal for negotiations about Iran’s nuclear program was initially welcomed by the Iranian authorities with skepticism, mockery and clearly denied. Since then, it has been confirmed that the letter was really sent, the episode underlined the deep insecurity and dysfunction that characterizes the relationship between Washington and Tehran.

Trump’s announcement, Foxes The interview was characteristically arrogant. “I wrote a letter to them, I hope you negotiate,” HE in questionAdds that Iran can also do “Still” US military or “Make an agreement”. The president’s words were accompanied by trademark threats and uncertain promises, and his observers wondered if it was a real diplomatic upure or only another part of the political theater.

The Iranian reaction was fast and blunt. Minister of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi Tehran not taken Such a letter, although he heard about the rumors of someone “On the road”. Meanwhile, Ayatollah Khanei, who has been skeptical for US intentions for a long time, repetitive The stance of negotiating with Washington “Mindless, foolish and degrading”. This feeling is widely shared among the political elite of Iran, which sees Trump’s management naturally unreliable after withdrawing from the 2015 nuclear agreement known as the Commonly Comprehensive Action Plan of the USA (JCPOA).

On the surface, Trump’s letter can be seen as a rare initiative to increase tensions between the two countries. Since his arrival, Trump has followed a “maximum pressure” policy against Iran, hid the sanctions and increased military threats. The letter may indicate the desire to explore a diplomatic solution, even if it is real, even if it is included in the typical hawthorn and uncertainty mixture.

For Iran, which faces serious economic problems due to US sanctions, the possibility of renewed negotiations may provide a way of relief. The country’s economy has been beaten by the collapse currency, which was worsened by inflation, unemployment and COVİD-19 pandemi. Return to the negotiation table can provide a very needed reprieve if it leads to the abolition of sanctions.

Moreover, Trump’s letter can serve the international society as a symbolic gesture that shows that the US is open to dialogue. This can help to rebuild some of the diplomatic capital, a movement that alienates even the closest allies of America, when Trump is unilaterally withdrawn from JCPOA in 2018. Trump may be trying to position himself as peaceful by pointing to interaction.

However, Trump’s letter of potential positive, prominent flaws and the wider context of the US policy towards Iran is shaded. For beginners, the reliability of the letter is weakened by Trump’s own record. The fact that the administration abandoned JCPOA, which is considered a wide turning point diplomatic success, was deeply suspected of US intentions. Ayatullah Khamenei’s refusal to interact with Trump stems from this insecurity that deepened because the United States continues to implement harsh sanctions and arrange military threats.

Trump’s approach suffers from a fundamental contradiction. On the same day, the Treasury Secretary claimed that he had sent his letter. Scott BessentHe promised to intensify sanctions against Iran, which targets the oil sector and drone production capabilities. It is unlikely that carrots and bar will come side by side and convince Tehran to come to the table. As Iranian authorities have repeatedly stated, they will not negotiate under pressure.

Moreover, Trump’s announcement to the public before the letter is delivered shows that the movement is less about diplomacy and local and international stance. By frames the letter as a big gesture, Trump may be trying to support his image as a dealer as a dealer begins to respond to Iran. However, it is unlikely that this tactic will echo with Iranian leaders who see public demonstrations insincere and manipulative.

The timing of Trump’s letter is also important. Iran’s nuclear program is progressing rapidly and the threat of military conflict is progressing greatly. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Iran’s Uranium currently reported that JCPOA has enriched to levels close to weapons, which are a clear violation of its borders. This climb is a direct response to the withdrawal of the United States from the agreement and the recapture of sanctions that leave very little incentives to comply with Iran.

Iran’s domestic politics is also in the flow. Conservative Sovereign Parliament clashed with Iranian President Masoud PesshkianA reformer who defends the engagement with the West. The rejection of negotiations with the US, Ayatullah Khanei reflects a wider conservative stance that any agreement with Washington will be a delivery for the American hegemony. This internal power struggle complicates that Iran’s ability to respond to Trump’s decisions, even if it tends to do it.

In the last analysis, Trump’s letter to Iran seems to be a movement to attempt to attempt to diplomacy and to shape the narrative around the US-Iran relations. While presenting a light of hope for dialogue, letters are weakened by the confidence of the administration in sanctions and threats, as well as in depth of Iran’s insecurity to US intentions.

In order to make any significant progress, both sides will need to show a real commitment to increased and compromise. This will require the US to maximize the maximum printing campaign and its flexibility in Iran’s nuclear program and regional activities. However, considering the existing political dynamics in both countries, such a breakthrough does not seem possible.

While watching this last chapter in the US-Iran epic, something is clear: without a fundamental change in the approach, the cycle of confrontation and insecurity will continue, with potentially disaster consequences for the region and beyond. Trump’s letter is unlikely to change it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jcstunnesg

Imran Khalid is a geostrategic analyst and columnist in international relations. His work has been widely published by prestigious international news organizations.

Support independent journalism subscribe to IA.