Queen Elizabeth was a REMAINER: Monarch ‘wanted Britain to remain in the EU as “it’s better to stick with the devil you know”‘, royal book claims
Queen II. Elizabeth was a residue against Britain’s decision to leave the European Union, a new book was claimed.
In one of the few important insights about the late Monarch’s political tendencies, the Queen claimed that he told a senior minister three months before the 2016 Brexit referendum: ‘We should not leave the EU.’
It is said that he added later: ‘It is better to stick to the devil you know.’
Bomb revelation, ‘Power and Saray: The interior of the monarchy and 10 Downing Street’ titled formerly former royal reporter Valentine Low appeared in a book.
In a core that was laid in Times this evening, a Bucingham Palace could be disappointed by the Queen Brussels bureaucracy, but he saw the EU as a part of the post -war settlement, pointing to a period of cooperation after two world war.
Former Prime Minister David Cameron added: ‘He was very careful not to express a political view, but always, like most of the issues, you thought that European cooperation was necessary and important, but you thought that EU institutions could sometimes get out of infurius.’
The allegations are flying against a controversial title in the Sun newspaper until the 2016 Brexit referendum claiming to ‘support the Queen Brexit’.
Queen II. Elizabeth supported the fact that England remained part of the European Union during the controversial 2016 referendum vote and claimed a book
It is claimed that the Queen told to a senior minister three months before the 2016 Brexit referendum: ‘We should not leave the EU.’
In the picture: David Cameron at Buckingham Palace with Queen Elizabeth in 2010
Buckingham palace complained about the story, insisted that the ruler was ‘politically neutral’, and the Sun was forced to publish a decision from the press observer that the title was ‘significantly misleading’.
Buckingham Palace refused to comment on new claims, and in line with his policy, he was not withdrawn to public statements about biographies or books in the royal family.
Former Chancellor George Osborne said that although very little is known about the late Queen’s political ideology, it could be surprisingly prioritized.
“I was constantly surprised how sincere he was and none of them had come out,” he said. ‘
It would be very clear in explaining what he thought about individuals, including members of his own family and what he thought about things in the country. ‘
However, a well -placed royal source insisted on the mail, ‘No one, even the closest advisors, what the queen thought about a wide variety of political issues for years, at least what Brexit thought’.
“Sometimes people impose their own political ideologies when interpreting the statements that their majesty say or may not say. Usually with such allegations, they hold a mirror to the opinion of the person who declares them. ‘
In 2016, following the title ‘Queen Brexit’, he stopped with the sun report and said that the title was ‘supported by the story’.
Ormer Chancellor George Osborne said that although he was known to the public about the late Queen’s political ideology, he could be surprisingly surprisingly.
Buckingham Palace refused to comment on new allegations, in line with his policy, the royal family is not drawn to public statements about biographies or books.
The story was based on the critical interpretations of the Queen about Brussels during a lunch at Windsor Castle in 2011.
The Queen claimed that during a swap with Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, he made humiliating comments about the EU.
This claimed that deputies at Buckingham Palace made more critical comments about the EU at the reception – referring to two anonymous sources.
Former Justice Secretary Michael Gove was later called the source of the leak. Mr. Clegg said the report was nonsense, and at the time, Buckingham Palace said: ‘The queen remained politically neutral as it has been for 63 years.
“ We will not comment on fake, anonymous allegations. The referendum is a matter of the British people to decide. ‘
IPSO’s decision did not violate the code of the content of Sun’s article, the title ‘refers to the Queen’s referendum debate and that there was nothing in the title, or presented on the front page of the newspaper, it was not read, hyperbole or not read.
A royal source insisted on the mail, even his closest advisors, what the Queen thought about a wide variety of political issues for years, at least what Brexit thought ‘.
In 2019, the Queen was dragged into discussions surrounding Brexit, and then Prime Minister Boris Johnson advised Prorogue Parliament as part of the ruler’s attempt to force the government through the EU plans.
The Supreme Court later decided that it was illegal to suspend and that the prorogation was broken.
Buckingham Palace officials are said to be concerned about whether the Queen is aware of what the Queen is entering, according to journalist Tim Shipman, published last year.
