google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
Hollywood News

US judge says Pentagon’s Anthropic blacklisting looks like punishment for AI safety views

The Pentagon’s blacklisting of Anthropic appears to be an effort to punish the AI ​​lab for going public with concerns about AI safety in the military, a US judge said on Tuesday. Anthropic’s lawsuit in California federal court alleges that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth overstepped his authority by calling Anthropic a national security supply chain risk. The government may apply this label to companies that expose military systems to potential infiltration or sabotage by enemies.

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco, an appointee of former Democratic President Joe Biden, said during the hearing that the appointment “appears to be an attempt to cripple Anthropic.”

Also Read | OpenAI sweetens private equity pitch amid corporate turf war with Anthropic

“DOW appears to be punishing Anthropic for trying to bring this contract dispute to public scrutiny,” Lin said, using the acronym for War Department, President Donald Trump’s new name for the Department of Defense.

The hearing concerns Anthropic’s request to temporarily block the appointment while litigation continues. The unprecedented appointment, which comes after Anthropic refused to allow the military to use its Claude AI software for US surveillance or autonomous weapons, prevents Anthropic from exiting certain military contracts. This could cost the company billions of dollars this year in lost business and reputational damage, Anthropic executives said March 9.


The company opposes seeing domestic surveillance as a violation of rights, stating that artificial intelligence models are not reliable enough to be used safely in autonomous weapons.

THE FIRST ANTHROPIC DESIGN FOR OUR USA COMPANY

Anthropic’s designation was the first time a U.S. company was publicly identified as a supply chain risk under an obscure government procurement law aimed at protecting military systems from foreign sabotage. In its lawsuit filed March 9, Anthropic alleged that the government violated its right to free speech under the First Amendment to the Constitution by retaliating for its views on AI safety. The company said it was not given a chance to challenge the appointment, violating its Fifth Amendment right to due process.

Also Read | Antropik challenges Pentagon’s national security risk claim in response to lawsuit

The lawsuit says the decision was unlawful, unsupported by facts, and inconsistent with the military’s past praise for Claude.

The Justice Department countered that Anthropic’s refusal to lift the restrictions could lead to uncertainty at the Pentagon about how it could use Claude and pose a risk of disabling military systems during operations, according to the court filing.

The government said the appointment was due to Anthropic’s refusal to accept contract terms, not its views on AI security. Anthropic has a second lawsuit pending in Washington, D.C., over a separate supply chain risk designation that could lead to the Pentagon removing it from civilian government contracts.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button