Why Starmer launched his attack on ‘racist’ Farage
IT is often said to define who the best way for a politician is not to describe who they are, but to define their enemies.
For Margaret Thatcher, he worked with the ‘enemy’ for calling miners leader Arthur Scargill.
Tony worked with Saddam Hussein, whom he chose for Blair – until he found out that Saddam’s threat was largely exaggerated.
The first 14 months after Downing Street, Sir Keir Starmer is trying to revive his lengths of this week with a similar tactic at the Labor Conference.
While Nigel described Farage and reform as “enemy” and “racists ,, he deliberately raised the political warmth.
There are many people who will applaud him for this.
Regardless of what the surveys say between the elections, when the British voters marked their crosses in a real general election votes, the winning party is not always seen as extreme, but close to the center.
If it seems possible, if it reveals the greatest challenge for labor in the next elections, the best way to deter him to vote for them to vote for them is to demonize Farage as Oswald Mosley for the last day.
How many good British would vote for a party with such a reputation because they could be on the crisis of migration and small boats?
The answer is not much.
Moreover, the calculation is that Labour’s main traditional enemy, Tories’s reform, can actually be his advantage – more.
If the worker can present himself as the only applicable central party, he can win Starmer in a straight struggle with reform – in a variation of the argument of ‘you know’.
Considering this, Starmer is currently confronting a virtual war with Farage on the Flag of Farage, and rarely does not give 10 interviews without one in the background to prove who the true ‘patriot’ is.
However, this tactic is not dangerous.
Starmer should be careful not to demonize people who support the reform.
If the surveys are right, they constitute a short portion of approximately 20 million people in all three of the adult population.
Hillary Clinton was forced to apologize in the 2016 US elections after calling Donald Trump’s supporters’ supporters’ as part of the ‘expectation of Donald Trump’s supporters’ and racist rhetoric’ crime.
He lost duly lost.
Surely, he was more careful in the Starmer’s language, but the danger continues.
Meanwhile, former Cabinet Minister Andy Burnham began to fight against the enemy, where he faced the left in the form of a worker mayor for Manchester.
Starmer seized that they saw as a major mistake in the defense of a multi -pound support in public expenditures and claimed that governments would be ‘Hock on the bond markets ”.
Starmer said Liz Truss would lead to the recurrence of disaster policies.
Within a few days, personal attacks on Farage and Burnham are characterless with a normal cautious lawyer approach.
In order to judge the pre -conference interview, he was told to raise his play by injecting more dynamism and passion to the foggy nose sound from the interview he gave to Laura Kuensberg from the BBC.
It was less than authentic.
For all political flaws, Farage is a more convincing John Bull cartoon than Starmer.
Nor will he approach the street loan of Burnham, the northern king ‘.
Nobody voted for Keir Starmer in the last election because of his charisma.
They did it because they believed in him when he told him that he would change something better and clean the chaos he left Tories.
If he wants to have the chance to stay in power, he will have to overcome a larger enemy: that he has not been able to do so.
