Will Starmer survive? John Rentoul answers readers’ key questions on the Mandelson row

S.ir Keir Starmer has had a bruising week and it’s no surprise that many readers used a recent Q&A he had with me to test how serious the situation really is.

The Prime Minister’s handling of the Peter Mandelson controversy has left readers questioning not only the facts of the case but also his grip on power.

During the Ask Me Anything session, I pushed back on claims that Starmer’s position was immediately untenable, arguing that knowingly misleading parliament would normally lead to him demanding a resignation, but that I did not believe he had done so. Instead, the focus should be on the political consequences of what he admits was a mistake.

This reflection is the point where anxiety deepens. I think Starmer is unlikely to lead Labor at the next general election, but MPs have been reluctant to act against him, largely due to doubts about who will replace him. Angela Rayner is the frontrunner but does not have a large base of voters; Names like Andy Burnham and Wes Streeting are part of an unstable field.

Readers also raised questions about media scrutiny, Labour’s internal tensions and whether the crisis reflected a wider loss of authority. The overall picture shows a prime minister who is not yet done but is increasingly vulnerable; pressure is likely to increase rather than disappear.

Here are some of your questions and my answers in the Q&A:

Question: Is the media exaggerating this story?

Gordon Fielden

A.: This is a popular point of view, and I am grateful to Gordon for expressing it well. We Independent We are well aware that many people think that many of the details surrounding Peter Mandelson’s appointment to Washington are boring, insider, obsessive, and unrelated to more pressing issues such as the cost of living, war, immigration, or healthcare.

On the other hand, there are many people (see “Blacko” above) who think we failed to bring Mandelson, Morgan McSweeney and others under adequate scrutiny and allowed bad people to do bad things.

We hope to deliver a variety of news coverage and analysis to satisfy a broad audience and hold politicians accountable to the national interest. Inevitably this will involve simplifications, especially in the headlines, that will offend some knowledgeable readers. It may even contribute to the overheating of the media environment, which Gordon thinks is bad for the country.

I disagree. A free press is essential to democracy, and lively disagreement about politics and the actions of politicians is the lifeblood of a free society.

Question: Is the Mandelson saga a political “hit job” against Starmer?

Cat

A.: If you are going to be Prime Minister, you will be criticized. Moreover, some of your supporters will think the criticism is unfair. Unfortunately, Starmer’s supporters admitted he made a mistake in appointing Mandelson. He’s upset too, but he doesn’t think that means he should resign, and I agree with him. Others may have a different opinion. Long live pluralism and democracy.

Question: Did Starmer knowingly mislead Parliament?

AmazingFunny

A.: Knowingly misleading Parliament on an important issue may be a matter of resignation, but I don’t see Keir Starmer doing that. Remember, I didn’t think the privileges committee should have made a decision like it did against Boris Johnson, whose premiership was terminated for political reasons because his party rightly thought he would lose at the next election.

Question: Why is Starmer still Prime Minister?

Robbie

A.: “I was elected by the British people”, as he said at the PMQs on Wednesday, “because they were fed up with 14 years of Tories”. Or words to that effect.

Question: Can Starmer survive and win the next election?

DisgustedMediumFrom England

A.: I think Starmer is unlikely to lead Labor at the next general election, but as long as Angela Rayner is the likely winner of the Labor leadership election, Labor MPs will hold back from unseating her. It’s possible that after next month’s Scottish, Welsh and English local elections, enough Labor MPs (81) will decide Rayner can’t get any worse, but I think it’s more likely that Labour’s trauma will continue into next year.

Q: Why don’t Labor MPs support Rayner?

Dan Dennis

A.: I think he was unjustly downgraded in two respects. She suffers from prejudice against a working-class woman, often expressed in the form of her intelligence being questioned, even though it is obvious from her career that she has extraordinary political abilities. And the public seems to take a much harsher view of the underpayment of stamp duty than is justified, which strikes me as an honest mistake in a complex situation. He should have received detailed advice in the first place, but this was not a capital offense.

As for its appeal to green voters, I don’t think it is popular outside Labor ranks. Party members love her and would probably vote for her if there was a vacancy now, but former Labor voters who backed Hannah Spencer in the Gorton by-election are unlikely to be swayed by her.

Question: Who are reliable successors?

Laertes

A.: There are ambitious heir candidates waiting behind. How reliable they are is a matter of opinion. I think Angela Rayner is more trustworthy than Andy Burnham, who was a very good mayor but never seemed to have much to offer as a prime minister.

We reported that Burnham and Rayner met in the Manchester constituency last week and discussed a possible alliance in the event of a leadership election. It is possible that Rayner may want to help Burnham get back into Parliament if he thinks that he cannot be Prime Minister but that he can and that Burnham can give him a big job. But I think since he had his best interests at heart, his meetings were more likely to be about forming alliances that could help him.

Personally, I think Rayner would be a good Prime Minister, but he is not very popular among the wider electorate. My preferred candidate would be Wes Streeting, the health minister, who is a reformer and a good communicator.

Question: Does it really matter who replaces Starmer? Politicians are all the same

captaintripps

A.: Voters are not powerless. This kind of paranoid conspiracy thinking is harmful. People can always make a choice between politicians and the policies offered, even if the difference between unsatisfactory options is very small.

Question: Will Starmer have a future role after becoming Prime Minister?

Imsethorus

A.: In the current situation, I think he would be a good secretary of state because he has established good relations with many world leaders, even if Donald Trump seems to have given up on him. The fact that he is extremely unpopular with the British public should not prevent this.

These questions and answers were part of a study. ‘Ask Me Anything‘ hosted by John Rentoul On Friday, April 24 at 11:00. Some questions and answers in this article have been edited. You can read the entire discussion in the comments section. original article.

For more on UK politics, check out John’s weekly Commons Confidential newsletter. Independent exclusive email premium subscribers, taking you behind the Westminster curtain. If this sounds like something you’d be interested in, Go here to learn more.