Young fans and critics debate his political legacy

The sudden and violent death of American activist Charlie Kirk, who gathered a youth movement and has a famous status among its fans, led to violent debate about its political heritage.

31 -year -old supporters appreciated their conservative Christian values ​​and open views. While talking to the BBC, many of them were tears because they remembered a man who listened to them and understood their worries.

His views were polarized in the university campuses, where he organized major events, and his provocative speeches would attract the crowd of vocal opponents and fans.

Kirk was a strong supporter of arms rights, criticizing the violent abortion, transgender rights, and encouraged false allegations about Covid-19. It wasn’t shy when he came to express his views – and his detectors did not retreat.

The open debates that encouraged and participated in Fierce were at the center of both professional success and personal worldview. “When people stop talking, then you will be subjected to violence, Kir Kirk says in a video that has been widely shared since his death.

“When people stop talking,” he adds, “then the civil war takes place, because you start to think that the other side is very bad and that they lose their humanity.”

Now, both the supporters and the competitors were shaken after being Debatirng at a university in Utah with a single shot on the stage.

“Sorry, miserable,” he said, 21 -year -old left -wing impressive Dean Withers, known for arguing about political issues, including Kirk, and for discussing conservatives.

In an emotional video sent to millions of followers, Withers said that weapon violence was “always disgusting, always inferior and always disgusting”.

Most of the tributes referring to the severity of weapons have clearly returned to disturbing interpretations, which implies that Kirk deserves to be shot because of his position on arms rights, and that more people have weapons and some shooting deaths are inevitable.

These comments also reflect a broader conversation after his death. Since people paid tribute to Kirk and wished their condolences to their wife and children, many emphasized that political violence is never right, regardless of their views.

Withers, for example, stressed that Kirk never accepted his ideas, but it should never happen.

“I shouldn’t be shock that I think Charlie Kirk is a bad person – I made it very clear last year,” he said. “But does that mean he deserves to lose his life? No.”

Ohio, a student in Cleveland, Saar, “Today I have had many conversations with people on the campus, and everyone acknowledges that it is shocking.” He said.

Müz Most people I talk about do not have the same politically agree with him, but we are very uncomfortable with what happened, ”he said.

Immediately beyond the shock and tribute, some began to discuss Kirk’s legacy as one of the leading political activists in America. Many of them wrestle with the influence of a man who attracts fiery crowds, who brought young people to politics and conservative Christian thought, and at the same time shocked many of his provocative views.

Kirk talked about a spouse and two children – his family and was an unapologist’s advocate of Evangelical Christianity.

“It was one of the main people who really helped to be brave about my Christian faith,” Influencer Savanna Stone, Florida, told BBC. He said.

Two years ago, a 20 -year -old, Kirk’le believes that something he believes in a traditional wife to adopt stereotypes of stereotypes of gender is a self -defining “tradwife”.

Stone said he was nervous to speak publicly about his belief and traditional values.

“Feminism really damaged the nucleus family and damaged women,” he said, and added that he was seriously criticized for talking about his beliefs.

“Charlie Kirk made me think more critically about feminism,” Stone added.

Many loyal supporters of Kirk won. They could clearly hear their ideas and were surrounded by other young people all over the political landscape – an environment that produces explosive viral videos of frequent exchange and decay.

Sixteen -year -old Ellie from Brooklyn in New York told BBC that she and her friends “angry” when she saw these clips.

Im When we learned about his death, I wanted to know that I was misinterpreted or wrong, so I looked at Youtube again, ”he said.

“But in a discussion, I found that the way of speaking with people did not open a real debate – especially when he argued with a woman. He tends to talk very quickly and talk to them.” He said.

“Everyone I know is terrified of his shot,” the young added. “Nobody should be shot for saying their ideas.”

Julia Pierce, a member of Kirk’s organization, said Turn Point Usa, Kirk for more than 10 years, will be remembered for giving young conservatives to themselves in the United States because they have the trust of being themselves.

“Being a democrat for young people was cool for young people. But he lived with traditional family values ​​to be a Trump supporter and to wear a maga hat.”

At the age of 14 with Kirk, the activist Chandler Crump, who has been attending every turning point since then, feels similarly.

Chandler, “Maga hats wearing young black leaders and said it is not important to be black or white,” he said. He said.

“Political figures tend to talk to us – but he did not know. He paid attention to us. So young people listened to him.”

Kirk’s attitude towards gay and transgender rights was particularly polarized.

He opposed homosexual marriage and opposed gender care for transsexual people, and often expressed Christian faith in these issues.

In 2019, “I believe that marriage is one woman.”

“Also gay people should be welcomed in the conservative movement. As Christians, we are called to love everyone.”

However, last month, Kirk, who opposed the month of pride and celebrations, drew a critique of writing about X: “It should be legal to burn a rainbow or [Black Lives Matter] Flag in public opinion. “

Activist Josh Helfgott said Kirk is “America’s highest homophobe, and his words caused tremendous damage to LGBTQ+ people.”

“This was more than the political theater. LGBTQ+ was a dangerous, dangerous, real world attack,” hefgott, referring to one of the podcast departments that he called to prohibit gender care.

Even if they agree with Kirk, the young people who BBC spoke is a potentially dangerous turning point in the freedom of speech and expression.

During his debate with Kirk in May, Tilly Middlehurst, a student of Cambridge University, a viral viral, said, “Political violence affects us all, not only affects people you disagree,” he said.

“This is not a step in the right direction. This does not fight fascism,” he said. “This is not what politics should appear like this.”