Trump claims PM Modi will stop buying Russian oil: Can India-US trade deal crush Putin’s war on Ukraine? | World News
New Delhi: The India-US trade deal, announced on February 2, was sold by Washington as more than just a commercial breakthrough. By linking the tariff reduction and access to U.S. markets to where India gets its oil, Donald Trump’s administration is presenting the deal as a strategic move that could weaken Russia’s war economy by reducing oil sales to one of its major customers.
The question experts ask is whether this claim is valid. Since the start of the Ukraine war in 2022, India has emerged as one of the top destinations for discounted Russian crude oil. As Europe phased out Russian oil, Moscow redirected supplies to Asia, while India increased its imports due to attractive prices and flexible payment terms.
For Russia, New Delhi became not just another customer; It has been an equalizer. Even when oil prices fell or sanctions tightened, Indian refiners helped keep Russia’s export volumes high and revenues flowing.
Add Zee News as Preferred Source
That’s why President Trump’s claim that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had agreed to halt purchases of Russian oil attracted immediate global attention. If true in substance and sustainable in practice, such a change would deal a blow to one of Moscow’s most reliable energy lifelines.
Can US oil replace Russian crude for India?
Energy analysts warn that the agreement should not be considered a definitive break. Russian oil works for India for three reasons: price, logistics and refining compatibility. Most of Russia’s Ural crude oil has been processed efficiently by Indian refineries in the last four years. Although U.S. crude oil is abundant, it is generally more expensive, travels longer distances, and often requires adjustments to blending or refining configurations.
This doesn’t mean India can’t buy more American oil, it already does. But replacing Russian barrels entirely would increase costs unless global prices soften or Washington offers trade incentives beyond tariffs.
Venezuela, which Trump has mentioned as a potential supplier, adds another layer of uncertainty. While heavy crude oil is available to Indian refineries, Venezuela’s production has been constrained by years of underinvestment and sanctions-related bottlenecks.
Experts say the likely outcome will be diversification rather than complete replacement, with India buying less and less Russian oil over time rather than stopping suddenly.
Will the decrease in India’s purchases weaken Russia?
Even a partial reduction would be significant. India is among Russia’s largest oil customers. If New Delhi meaningfully reduces its purchases, Moscow will have to either find alternative buyers at higher discounts or cut production. Both scenarios squeeze revenue.
But Russia has shown resilience by expanding sales to China and operating a “shadow fleet” to evade sanctions. As a result, most analysts think India’s reductions alone will hurt Russia but not cripple it.
Ending the war in Ukraine through energy pressure, as Trump proposes, would require coordinated action from many major buyers, not just India.
India’s strategic autonomy still drives decisions
From New Delhi’s perspective, the trade deal represents a pragmatic bargain rather than a strategic realignment. India provided tariff reductions and expanded access to the US market at a time when protectionism was rising internationally.
However, India has repeatedly emphasized that its energy decisions will continue to be market-driven. Officials have long resisted presenting oil imports as a political tool, arguing that affordability and security of supply come first for a country with huge energy demands.
This suggests that the move away from Russian oil will be gradual, calibrated and reversible if market conditions change.
What does the agreement actually imply?
The significance of the India-US trade deal is how clearly energy has been weaponized in trade diplomacy.
The message for Washington is clear: Access to the US market now carries with it expectations of strategic alignment. For India, the agreement shows how far it can negotiate interests without formally abandoning its non-aligned stance.
For Russia, the signal is more disturbing. Even long-standing partners are now negotiating energy ties under Western pressure. This is an indication that Moscow’s post-Ukraine economic isolation is limited.
The India-US trade deal alone will not end the Ukraine war. But it shows a shift in how global power is wielded, with trade tariffs, oil supplies and geopolitics now clearly intertwined in the same negotiations.
Whether Russia feels the real pain will depend not on headlines but on shipping data, refinery contracts and how closely India follows when the cameras are gone.
