‘Asim Munir Is Osama Bin Laden In Suit’: Ex Pentagon Official Blasts Pakistan Army Chief Over Nuclear Threat | India News
Former Pentagon Analyst Michael Rubin, Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir seriously criticized the last ‘nuclear threat’ by criticizing him, calling him “Osama bin Laden in a suit” and said he would not change any concession ideology or Pakistan elite to Pakistan.
Pakistani Army President General Asim Munir threatened Pakistan’s “if it falls, it will pull half of the world down”. Comments were reported to be held during a meeting with US military officials in Tampa, Florida.
Rubin added that Pakistan’s threat of using a nuclear weapons against half of the world is a clear indication that it has lost its right to be seen as a legitimate state.
“Donald Trump is a businessman and is accustomed to horse trade … He does not understand that a bad peace agreement can really advance the war … The Americans are looking at terrorism with the complaint lens … In a suit and Pakistan, there will be no concessions to Pakistan … The times to enter Pakistan to secure the nuclear weapons of the administrations.
#WRISTWATCH | Washington DC, USA | In the upcoming meeting between us and Russia, former Pentagon official Michael Rubin said, “
“Donald Trump is a businessman and accustomed to horse trade … He does not understand that there is a bad peace … pic.twitter.com/cra1y24e19– Ani (@ani) 12 August 2025
Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official and Middle East analyst, told the moment that Pakistan’s behavior was “completely unacceptable”.
“Pakistan asks questions about whether to fulfill the responsibilities of being a state in the minds of many people.” He said. “Field Marshal’s discourse, the Islamic state reminds us of what we hear.”
Rubin immediately called Pakistan’s status as a non -NATO ally, and immediately called for diplomatic results, including potentially identifying terrorism as a state sponsor. He also suggested that General Munir should be declared as non -Persona Grata and prohibit him from obtaining a US visa.
Analyst expressed its special concerns about the US officials not to respond immediately during the alleged statements. The Minister argued that the Pakistani army chief should be accompanied by the meeting immediately and should be expelled from the country.
“Asim Munir’s comments should be revealed within 30 minutes after Asim Munir makes these comments, Tampa should be taken to the International Airport and fly from the United States.” He said.
Former Pentagon official, President Trump’s ongoing participation with Pakistan may be affected by external factors, he said.
He said that Trump’s approach represented the separation of traditionally strong two-party support for the US-India partnership that has been developing since George W. Bush.
Rubin made a wider picture of regional instability, making Pakistan’s nuclear threats could make terrorist elements “bandits” with nuclear weapons. He argued that Pakistan represented a different challenge from traditional diplomatic disputes.
“The Americans are looking at terrorism from the lens of complaints.” He continued: “They do not understand the ideological foundations of many terrorists. Asim Munir, Osama bin Laden in a suit.”
Perhaps the most controversial, Rubin suggested that the international community should allow Pakistan to allow Pakistan to allow Pakistan to allow Pakistan to enter what it calls a “ruled decline”, including the recognition of separation zones, such as Belucistan. It has even increased the possibility of future military intervention to secure Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.
“In a future administration, other seal teams approaching Pakistan to secure their nuclear weapons, because the alternative is too big to withstand.” He said.
The interview emphasized the complex relationship network affecting US policy in South Asia. Rubin said Trump’s latest tensions on sanctions on trade and Russian energy purchases with India are not inefficient, and that the US bought strategic materials from Russia.
After the approach of the current administration, the US-Indian relations would probably recover and define the existing tensions as a “stress test” that will ultimately strengthen the partnership.
The analyst’s comments reflect increasing concerns about Pakistan’s stability and nuclear abilities. Although coping proposals with Pakistan seem to go far beyond the current US policy, it emphasizes the difficulties faced by policy makers while traveling in relationships with nuclear armed situations in a more variable region.
(With memory entrances)
