Madhampatty Rangaraj moves Madras High Court over defamatory posts by costume designer Joy Crizildaa

Madhampatty Thangavelu Hospitality Private Limited approached the Madras Supreme Court to restrict that the costume designer Joy Crizildaa, who claims to have married one of the managers of the Catering company, insulted the “Madhampatty Pakashala’s goodwill and reputation”.

Justice N. Senthilkumar ordered the notification to the costume designer on Tuesday, September 9, 2025 to the costume designer until 16 September, to the costume designer in a case opened by the Catering company, and allowed the company’s vijayan subramanian’s record lawyer to make a special notification since the case was scheduled to be heard within a week.

Brand reputation

During the discussions, Senior Advisor PS Raman, representing the plaintiff company, was founded on August 30, 2010 and left a mark in Catering and Food Services under the brand ‘Madhamampatty Pakashala’. It has become very popular over the years.

Stating that his popularity is due to the hard work of individuals involved in the business world and the food quality offered to them, the Senior Consultant said that the company has invested a significant amount of money to raise awareness among the public about high quality catering service.

Compatible efforts included the ‘Madhampatty Pakashala’ brand a reliable name in the hospitality industry and included customer distinguished personalities, celebrities, politicians, companies, government and private institutions. It was also widely handled in kitchen magazines and other media.

Joy Crizildaa’s Social Media Publications in Rangaraj

However, in July 2025, Mrs. Crizildaa, the company’s brand Madhampatty Pakashala, Madhampatty Pakashala’s brand Madhampatty Pakashala, and other brands associated with it began to publish messages.

In his case, the company said: “The plaintiff’s trademark is deliberately borrowed by the first defendant (Mrs. Crizildaa) to spread the wrong and scandal allegations to share a marriage relationship with Rangaraj with the evil and preliminary motivation.”

The beach continued to read: “These allegations are completely wrong, fabricated and lack of any real foundation, and the plaintiff’s ‘Madhampatty Pakashala’ and other brands and other brands and management were deliberately made to damage the reputation of the public.”

To specify the personal affairs of an individual manager cannot be used to underestimate the reputation of the company, which has been built for years of hardworking, commitment and honor; The plaintiff said the defendant’s actions would cause serious reputation and commercial damages to the company.

The plaintiff, the court, the defendant, false or malicious materials, expressions, videos, reel, subtitles, or Madhampatty Pakashala’s “goodbye, insulting any wrong or malicious materials, expressions, videos, reels, subtitles or termination, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing Publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, publishing, ((

He also sought a direction to erase the slander tasks in social media handles and accounts.