Insult from Harry that drove Diana’s butler Paul Burrell to reveal another raft of royal secrets: RICHARD KAY

All this week, Paul Burrell rarely released from the air waves with an endless radio interview, day television sofa views and podcasts.

Tomorrow, TV presenter Lorraine Kelly reaches its peak with a two -hour ‘chat’ live activity hosted in London’s Cadogan Hall.

Daily mail readers, of course, are already familiar with the new Royal Butler’s newly published memories of The Royal Insider’s four -day series.

The Queen took my life with the king and the princess Diana, an account that is active and sometimes left to the chin-for years, not in the heart of the royal family, but also for years.

Twenty -eight years have passed since Burrell was wearing the royal house uniform, but as explained to the skeptics: ‘I did not contact the world I once lived and worked’.

This is his third memories. Following the extraordinary intervention of the Queen on charges of theft, for the first time after the acquittal in Bailey, for the first time in 2003, Ten months before Diana’s death, he created a sensation to kill him in a car accident.

A second book, a portrait of Diana’s life at Kensington Palace, and his friendship came three years later. Now, we have a more personal memory in which the queen and the unexpected sincerity and the late Princess and then Prince Charles at that time.

It would be easy to reject this last offer as an exercise that only earns money for Burrell, or to join others who despise what he could say.

For many, the son of the coal board driver, who moved from Footman to the Queen, to the secret of the Wales Princess, is a separatist figure accused of taking advantage of Diana’s reputation as ‘rock’ and converting it into a cash machine.

Even this week, Burrell acknowledged that he was a ‘maritor’ character, and he knows that he can never win those who believe that his actions are unforgivable. Despite the commercial success, all books were betrayed.

So, in the light of such hostile reaction – after a 19 -year gap since the publication of the second Tome – why did Burrell chose to return to such anger?

In the interviews, he said he was motivated to write because he had never talked about what was the ‘wonderful’ Queen Elizabeth.

And it is true that there are stories that draw a warm picture of the late ruler along the 300 pages.

But at the same time, the diagnosis of cancer and the disease, not only from the outside world, but also according to Burrell, the close family hiding as a secret of the trust circle explains the new details.

In the summer of 2021, there is definitely a touch in the statement of how he received the news. ‘Well, it is a shame because I want to see Platin Jubilee next year and I want to see it.’ Can you keep me alive for that?

He continued to elaborate blood transfer and dietary changes, including giving up the beloved Gin and Dubonnet snacks, and in June 2022 he kept him alive to witness the turning point of his reign.

Burrell said in a statement to support one of the many cases against the newspaper attack, how Harry repeateds the old-Butler’s mother’s belongings.

But I believe that the real reason of the book is in a repeated theme: her anger towards Prince Harry. And in one episode, a sarcastically ‘there is something about Harry’, a statement emerges for this anger.

Burrell said in a statement to support one of his many cases against the newspaper attack, Harry’s old-Butler’s mother sold his belongings ” arrogant and damaging claims. Burrell says he shocked me to the nucleus because they are serious and completely unfounded. My character’s slander. ‘

Burrell’s suggestions that Princess Diana sold some of the properties were part of the investigation of the Scotland’s arrest and accusation of theft. Indeed, the case was given to both Charles and William by detectives at a critical meeting shortly before the trial was going to court.

However, after offering any evidence that anything was sold during the 2002 hearing, the police had to withdraw the allegations in a cross -examination.

To find out that they have emerged again thanks to Harry Provoked Burrell. Im I was angry that his character was questioned, so I challenged Harry through his lawyers about the mistake of his explanation, or he says.

Burrell said Harry’s lawyers’ lawyers’ acceptances of the profession that they have not received any instructions in responding to you ‘.

What made Harry’s horror even more interesting in his actions was his statement that he came face to face with the prince at a secret meeting at Kensington Palace with William.

The possibility of such a encounter seemed to be almost impossible to condemn the former assistants of their mother’s former aids for their ‘cold and open’ betrayal in the publication of the Royal Duty book in 2003. In a destructive statement dripping with anger, they said: ‘It is painful not only for both of us, but also for everyone affected, and if it were survived today, we will mortgage our mother and if we could say so, we will feel that we can talk more than PAVLUS for our mother.’

So what happened and why did they agree to meet him? In late 2017, shortly after the 20th anniversary of Diana’s death, they invited Burrell to return to Kensington Palace.

The brothers, who were still in good conditions during that year, were collaborating on their mothers in two television documentaries. Perhaps a complex project that was like that in such a way, had confused other emotions.

His own Diana memories were missing, during this year, close friends were contacted and he was invited to share with them and even photos. A friend told me that after such a meeting, Harry told me that he had ‘gaps’ in memory of his mother and that he was desperate to try to fill them.

But the story was missing because the princess divided his life into chapters.

Therefore, they called Burrell, his son Alexander and Nicholas, his childhood playmate. The meeting did not emphasize the previous indecision of Butler, but did not ignore them.

William, “ I wish you’ve done something through us and did different things, ‘says William.

He said he couldn’t reach them. “ They were in the world of their father, ” he wrote, ‘and they were not allowed anywhere.’ This was a familiar expression for me. Most of Princess’s friends were similar to attempts to communicate with men. I heard that the letters and birthday cards were not answered, and the phone calls never returned.

Burrell was grateful to the brothers for the meeting. “ For them, especially for the years they were in boarding school, I can fill gaps’ he remembered.

The encounter caused a wise William: ‘The mummy attracted you very close to him, Paul … We will not do this with our house.’

And aside from another aspect, Burrell told William to him: ‘Now you can quit, Harry and I can take over.’ Burrell does not record whether theft claims or trial has emerged. According to him, what they really wanted to know was where he thought about his parents.

He told them that Harry was coming out of the moment of birth in September 1984.

Looking at the newborn in the bed, Charles ‘oh, red hair’ he says. The Princess reminded him that it was a reddish paint again.

If the version of Burrell is true, the Prince brutally observed: ‘At least now I have my heir and my backed up and I can return to Camilla.’

Harry quietly took this ‘poker face’ in Burrell’s narration. “ I was in the tears, but he never escaped. I remember this moment clearly because he seemed to be the pain of his mother. ‘

Burrell argues that Harry may have heard this story for the first time, but the versions of the match between the Prince and the Princess have traveled in Andrew Morton’s book on royal marriage in 1992.

Burrell doubles in his book. ‘I said,’ Harry, that’s the truth. I don’t say that as your mother tells me exactly. And I think ‘you are old enough to know now’ before adding it.

The meeting aimed to remain confidential, but according to Paul Burrell, Harry ‘hateful and hurtful words’ meant that he had no alternative to writing about it.

“ I was humiliated by Harry, ” he says. I never wanted to explain that I met men at Kensington Palace. The children wanted to know the life of their mothers.

However, I have never had any options as a result of Harry’s actions since then. ‘

Regardless of Paul Burrell’s opinion, the week in England, when Prince Harry was hoping to be a compromise with his royal family, is in the UK, at least a warning of the Old Butler.