Aravalli forest reforestation under scrutiny by ABCM trustees, alleging conflict of interest and environmental violations

On Tuesday, August 12, 2025, Aravallis Bachchao Citizens Movements, an attempt to focus on protecting Aravali queue without environmental intact, objected to the placing of a patch in the sector as part of the Matriory as part of the Matriory for Matriory for Matriation for Matona for Matona. The action violated various laws that protect the forests and the environment, and the example of “incorrect prioritization”.

In a letter to Gurogram, a letter to Gurogram, in a letter to Gurogram in a letter to the Regional Forest Officer, the ABCM Board of Trustees, Vaishali Rana and Colonel Rana (RETD.), Wanted to know why a patch with a thick green shade was used instead of focusing on the vicious forest patches needed within the scope of the project. The duo, which is called as “misconduct”, wrote: “The reason seems to be open-providing entertainment facilities to adjacent ultra-luxury apartments built by private builders”.

The two, adding videos showing a few Backhoe loaders that clean the forest area, said that it was “the completely destroying habitat and nests ,, and even did not even fly with a large number of birds sitting in front of the machine. At the same time, it was a “conflict of interest için for afforestation with special builders accused of swallowing the forest area of the forest department.

Before any intervention, the duo immediately stopped all the foresting activities and the independent ecological assessment of the patch, and the action violated the Indian Forest Law, Forestry (Protection) Law, Wildlife (Protection) Law, and different provisions of the Indian Constitution.

In addition, he requested an investigation on the role of the forest department officials about the role of the developers with an environmental violations history and the role of the “Matri Van” project, not to the developing Aravali patches and the developing forest areas of the plantation activities.

Calls and short messages to the forest officer of the department Gurgram did not respond to any response.