Courts service accused of covering up IT bug that caused evidence to go missing

The courts working in the UK and Wales were accused of a cover after a few years to react to a leaked report that caused the loss of evidence, writing or disappearing on the evidence.

HM Courts and Courts Service (HMCTS) resources, as a result, judges in civilian, family and court courts will decide on the cases where evidence is missing.

The internal report leaked to the BBC, HMCTs, because it does not affect or affect cases because it does not conduct a comprehensive investigation, including how the data corruption, including how it does not know the full scope.

In addition, the HMCTS administration found that the judges and lawyers were not informed because they decided that they would be “higher than goodness than goodness.”

HMCTS said the internal investigation could not find evidence that the outcome of any case was affected as a result of these technical issues.

However, Sir James Munby, former president of the Family Department of the Supreme Court, told BBC that the situation was “shocking” and “a scandal”.

The error found in the case management software used by the Ministry of Justice Agency (MOJ) agency (MOJ), which ruled many courts in the UK and Wales, and the courts throughout the UK HMCTS.

The software, known as the Judicial Case Manager, MyHMCTS or CCD, is used to manage evidence before the courts and monitor cases. It is used by judges, lawyers, case workers and public members.

The documents shown by the BBC show that the data caused the hide of the view, ie medical records, contact information, and other evidence sometimes did not appear to be part of the case files used in court.

The Social Security and Children’s Support (USSCS) Court, which deals with the appeals of benefit, is thought to be the most affected.

Sources, BBC, insects, family, divorce, employment, civilian money demands and probee, including other courts, including other courts also affected the software, he said.

“These hearings usually decide the fate of people’s lives, Sir Sir James Munby said to the BBC. “A mistake may mean a difference between a child who has been removed from an insecure environment or a vulnerable person who misses benefits.”

In HMCTs, where the managers are trying to prove the flaws of the system, the BBC spoke with several separate sources that compare the situation to the Ufuk post office scandal.

One, introduced by HMCTS in 2018, says that “general fear” in the software design, which they claim to have “properly or firmly designed” and claim to have a long history of data loss.

Another, despite the repetitive warnings from the agency’s IT personnel, says the top management is a general reluctance of “accepting reality or face -to -face”.

“There is a covering culture,” he said to the BBC. “They are not worried about the risk of the people, they are worried about learning the risk of people. Triant to witness terrible.”

When asked, Moj told us that some organizations were involved in the design and development of the software, but did not give a list.

The BBC saw documents from MOJ (obtained through demands of freedom of information), including the e -mails in which the seriousness of the USSCS problem is discussed.

A briefing for the General Manager of HMCTS – dated March 2024 – revealing that the risk of trial was initially categorized as “high” and the possibility of the court results as “very likely” results in “serious reputation effect on HMCTs”.

However, the first manual investigation by a team within HMCTS has reviewed only one subset of the last three -month cases felt by the USSCS Court, although the error was thought to have been in the system for several years.

Only 109 (17%) of 609 cases found to have potential problems were selected for more research. Among these, only one was said to have a “potentially important effect”.

The briefing will mean that the standard court procedure will detect any abnormality and manually correct them.

Later, it was decided that all cases were low and there was no need for “other controls”.

The resources within HMCTs argue that a momentary image of three -month data is “completely inadequate”, given the nature of the problem.

Woodward is shared by Woodward, a leading IT Security Specialist Prof, who worries about the United Kingdom Government and consulted on issues, including judicial information process.

“[HMCTS] He carried out investigations on a series of limited cases, “he says. It doesn’t make sense to say that they cannot find any effect of these mistakes. “

The documents show that an HMCTS employee is very concerned and brought up a complaint of flying official information, which launched more internal investigations.

This was directed by a senior IT expert from the prison service and resulted in a detailed report distributed in November 2024.

This is the report leaked to the BBC.

It was established to “identify facts” on data loss and data degradation affecting the Social Security and Alimony Court.

He met 15 witnesses, including inspectors, software engineers and developers, and reviewed internal documents such as incident diaries and daily entries.

He found “large -scale” data violations that should be addressed at the time they are known “. However, the report said that HMCTs took a few years to react despite more than one warning of senior technical personnel since 2019.

Since the inspectors did not conduct a comprehensive investigation of the HMCTs, they have not yet known the full scope of data degradation, including the influence of the case results.

In the report, data loss incidents continue to come to the agenda against the CT system used by civilian, family and court courts.

The concerns put forward in the leaked report reflect the concerns of the speakers with the BBC.

Sources within HMCTS express their concerns that the missing evidence may not have been identified.

“This is a very frightening possibility,” he said to the BBC, “the disappearance of information, that no one has noticed and that justice is low. I think this should be the greatest concern.”

Sources say that a different IT defect in family courts has caused thousands of documents to disappear.

In an example, a mistake that caused more than 4,000 documents to disappear in hundreds of public family law cases, including child protection cases.

The BBC realizes that this error was discovered in 2023 and may have been present for several years. Since then, it has been solved, but there was no investigation to have a potential impact on the case results.

We asked MoJ that any emergency child protection case was not affected.

He didn’t answer this question.

In a statement, a HMCTS spokesman said that “the parties and judges involved in these cases have always accessed the documents they need”. Bringing the courts and courts to the modern age promised to “come forward” with digitalization because it is “vital”.

Do you have any information about this story you want to share?

Contact ALYS in the signal signal signal messaging application with a ALYS.HARTE@BBC.CO.UK or to protect your data from an end to the end designed to protect your data.

You can also use Securedrop, an extremely anonymous and safe way to contact the BBC that uses the TOR network.

Secureredrop: http://kt2bqe753wj6dgara2ryj4d6a5tccrivivbvod5ab3uxhug5fi624vsqd.onion/

Please note that the Securedrop connection will only work in a Tor browser. For information about safe and anonymous retention, here are some Advice on how to use Secureredrop.