Despite potential ratings nightmare for NHL, Vegas-Carolina Stanley Cup Final still has plenty of intrigue

After nearly a month and a half of blood, sweat, tears and handshake lines, the Stanley Cup Finals matchup has been determined.

And our two worthy rivals are the Vegas Golden Knights and the Carolina Hurricanes.

Oh boy.

I’m sure those are the same words that came out of the mouth of Commissioner Gary Bettman and every NHL marketing executive as Friday night’s Eastern Conference Finals game ended.

HURRICANES FROWARD SAYS POTENTIALLY DETERMINANT GAME 5 AGAINST THE CANADIANS HE’S NOT LOOKING TO THE PAST

From a ratings standpoint, you’d be hard-pressed to find a more disastrous matchup for the league than two relatively small, non-traditional markets severely lacking marketable on-ice superstars.

Say what you will about the Florida-Edmonton series the past two seasons, but at least there was a traditional hockey city desperately trying to get back to the top of the mountain alongside guys like Connor McDavid and Matthew Tkachuk.

There was superficial intrigue there, and it made for an easy sell.

Believe it or not, despite the ratings nightmare this finale has created for the NHL, there’s still plenty of intrigue to be had in the Vegas-Carolina matchup.

Let’s start with the players themselves.

Sure, you’re missing a McDavid, a Draisaitl, even a Tkachuk, but there are tons of really bright, young stars as well as established, well-known vets on both sides of the ice.

CAROLINA HURRICANES STAR SETH JARVIS’ CRAZY BATH SUGAR HABITS ARE GETTING SOME ATTENTION

Players like Jack Eichel, William Karlson, and Mark Stone in Vegas and Sebastian Aho, Jacob Slavin, and Seth Jarvis in Carolina are some of the best the league has to offer.

The Golden Knights are dealing with some off-ice distractions as they head to the Western Conference Final. (Images by Gary A. Vasquez-Imagn)

With both teams taking the ice, the quality of play will be at a high level.

I haven’t even mentioned perhaps the most interesting player of them all: Mitch Marner.

The former Maple Leaf was a whipping boy in Toronto when the Leafs failed to advance past the second round of the playoffs, but his first postseason performance in Vegas was nothing short of magical.

If the Golden Knights land Lord Stanley, there’s a good chance Marner will win the Conn Smythe, which would be a big shot for everyone in Toronto.

Marner’s rise from sacrificial lamb to playoff MVP would be worth the price of admission alone.

There are also great team stories to follow.

For Carolina, they finally saved their Eastern Conference Finals monkey after hitting a Florida Panthers team brick wall in 2023 and 2025.

Despite the franchise having a Stanley Cup from two decades ago, Rod Brind’Amour, the only person on the team with any experience in that Cup run, currently sits behind the bench in a suit and tie.

ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. GET THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!

Can the Hurricanes finally take advantage of getting over the hump in the Conference Finals?

And Vegas has a budding dynasty on its hands.

The franchise has only been around for nine years, but this is already its third trip to the Stanley Cup Finals.

They lost to the Capitals in 2018 (their first year of existence) and put on a masterclass against the Panthers in 2023.

If they win this year, they will be on the list of the best teams of the last decade, as two Cups and three appearances in the Stanley Cup Finals have already put them in a weak mood.

Mitch Marner is in great shape in his first playoff appearance with the Vegas Golden Knights. (Stephen R. Sylvanie-Imagn Images)

CLICK TO DOWNLOAD FOX NEWS APPLICATION

Okay, so it’s not the Rangers-Blackhawks game or any of the other intriguing matchups that the league office and TV executives dream of at the beginning of each season, but this year’s Stanley Cup Finals will still feature two great teams and plenty of interesting stories.

If you’re not excited about the series, just say you don’t like hockey.

It’s okay, I won’t judge (okay, maybe a little).