Reform UK accused by minister of talking ‘utter nonsense’ after Zia Yusuf implies Starmer trying to get Farage killed – UK politics live | Politics

Good morning. The study conference has ended, the conservative party starts on Sunday, but both have significant policy announcements today.

• For labor, Keir Starmer explains the government’s tightening plans for asylum seekers when the government is given the right to stay in the UK. “There will be no gold tickets to settle in England, people will have to win it.” RAJEEV SYAL There is a story.

• For conservatives, the Kemi Badenoch said that if the conservatives win the next election, they would abolish the Climate Change Law. Here is our story Fiona Harvey And Helena Horton.

I will give more information about these stories day by day.

There is a clear connection between the stories: Both in the Toray case (because the Nigel Farage will get rid of the Climate Change Law), but in the labor force case (because Farage does not want to bore the conditions for asylum seekers – shows that he does not want to ask for any of the labor force conference. beyond.

One result of the Working Conference, the ministers feel much more confident than blocking Farage’s party and we saw it this morning Mike TappMinister of Migration.

Yesterday Zia YusufThe President of the Reform Policy gave interviews at the Tuesday conference defending Starmer’s attack on Farage. The reform put the leader at risk. This was a strange claim from a party, invited the woman to jail for a tweet, and called on people to open fire on shelter hotels to address the party conference as a free speech martyr. Yusuf went even further. HE He implied that Starmer was intentionally trying to kill Farage. This was an uncomfortable claim that Guardian covered him. John Cracesketch. John wrote about Yusuf’s interview with Wilfred Frost in Sky News.

Yusuf was horrified by Starmer’s speech. He had been a vicious, right and inflammatory. Attempt to demonize Nige. Therefore, it was an incentive for violence. Here is the essence of this. Starmer knew he could not beat Farage on the ballot, so he was trying to assassinate him.

“There is a term known as ‘stochastic terrorism’, Z Zia continued. It was to prepare so much hatred that a supporter took them to kill the target. And Starmer was doing that. It was almost certainly that the Prime Minister was called terrorists in live news. Frost has repeatedly invited Yusuf to withdraw. To characterize his language. But Zia did not have any of them. Starmer was a terrorist. The only purpose of his speech was to encourage someone to kill Farage. Everything else was a curtain of smoke. Yusuf alone knew the truth. You are wondering what you do from Nige’s speeches.

In an interview with Times Radio, Crackle He was asked to answer. He said that Starmer’s claim that he wanted to provoke violence against Farage was “completely nonsense .. Continued:

Of course, we want all parliamentary members to be safe, and this is absolutely important, and no one wants Nigel Farage to come to Farage.

But look, if we want to say what we want to say, then we’re right to do this. This is freedom of speech.

This is also a completely snowfall of Zia Yusuf, who claims to reduce the freedom of speech while allowing him to say what he wants.

Here is the agenda of the day.

Morning: Keir Starmer is at the European Political Community Summit in Copenhagen. Jakub Krupa It deals with this on the European live blog.

17:00: He interviews a series of regional radio and TVs before the Kemi Badenoch conference. Most hours will be an embargo until 17.00.

If you want to contact me, please send a message under the line when the comments are open (normally between 10: 00-16: 00) or send me a message on social media. I can’t read all the BTL messages, but if you put it in a message for me, it is more likely to see it because I am looking for posts containing this word.

If you want to mark something urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me at Bluesky at @Andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. Guardian gave up sending from the official accounts in X, but the individual guardian journalists are there, I still have an account and if you send me a message at @AndrewSarrow, I will see it and I will answer if necessary.

I find it very useful when readers draw attention to mistakes, even small spelling errors. No error is too small to fix. And I find your questions very interesting. I can’t promise that you’ll answer all of them, but I will try to answer as much as possible on BTL or sometimes on the blog.