High Court Admits Plea On Scheduled Area tag

Justice of the Supreme Court of TaLangana adopted the objection of a writer who challenged the classification of the villages of the Mahabubabad region of the Mahabubabad region of the Mahabubabad region. The judge is dealing with a writing opened by Kathi Swamy and nine residents by the inhabitants of two villages. The petitions claimed that the treatment of these villages as planned areas were illegal and contrary to the Constitution and that the classification was contrary to the planned order and violated the constitutional provisions. They stated that the two villages were not included in the December 1950 presidential notification, which lists the planned regional villages in Narsampet Taluq. According to them, the existing classification residents limit their property to sell or buy and object to the elections. The plead of government argued that 75 years later, the petitions could no longer approach the court. Resisting this, petitions stated that their ancestors were illiterate and unaware of their rights and therefore they could not challenge the classification before. They tried to declare the classification invalid and to guide the authorities to behave as the villages that were not planned to Ayodhyapuram. The judge directed the petitions to open a summary on this issue and issued the case for more hearing.

HC RS 140 Crore gives bail in fraud case

The Supreme Court of TaLangana gave bail in a financial fraud case containing the Mudra Agriculture and Skill Development Multi -State Cooperative Association and allegedly collected deposits under the guise of government programs from job seekers and farmers. The judge was dealing with a penalty petition opened by the Thippenini Sai Kiran, who was arranged as a defendant in the case recorded by the CID’s economic crime wing. The prosecutor’s office claimed that the society, which was ruled by the father of the petition, had collected approximately 140 crore by misleading with the promises of work, salaries and loans under the programs of the Victims’ Central and State Government. The prosecution against bail, argued that the petition was involved in the cheating of depositors and encountered serious allegations. However, the petition lawyer claimed that the defendants were only their son, that he was a member of the society and had no role in the alleged fraud. It has been detained since July 2025 and 227 witnesses were examined. Considering the imprisonment time and the investigation phase, the judge expanded the petition on conditional bail.

The claim to despise on retirement advantages continues

On Thursday, the Justice Ev Venugopal of the Supreme Court of TaLangana rejected a petition by the chief secretary who asked for his existence in front of the court. The judge was engaged in a contempt case opened by Potti Sriramulu Telugu University’s retired M. Ramulu. He wanted to release his retirement advantages. In April 2023, his petition was allowed by the court. A writer’s appeal opened by the university was rejected and SLP was rejected. It is the situation in which the petition is finalized by the court’s decision and incompatibility is suitable for humiliation. Previously, Judge Telugu University called the chief secretary after receiving the government’s claim that the release of the pension should be released. The judge rejected the application to give up his existence and expanded his time to comply with September 19.