Experts issue scathing rebuttal to US government report: ‘A total disgrace’
A coalition of scientists, Government report This is said to have chosen cherry evidence, will not be transparent and do not have reliability.
What’s happening?
Trump Management released In July, a report titled “Critical Examination of the Effects of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the US climate”. However, reported The Guardian, a leading climate scientist, says that the study written by the anti -climate “recognized by the anti -climate” is a fair thing.
That the report does not provide a comprehensive picture of all evidence and 1972 Law This requires the administrative advisory committees to contain balanced perspectives. The referee did not enter the referee review process before the document was released.
“This report makes a mockery of science,” Texas A&M climate scientist Andrew Dessler said. Guardian. He continued: “Rejected a long time ago, the wrong statements of the body of scientific knowledge, lack of important facts, arm shaking, anecdotes and support supported by the confirmation of approval.”
“We should use scientifically examined and appropriately reviewed assessments to make legal decisions – not the recognized documents that offer a distorted opinion,” he added, “
Why is this important?
Critics say that the last report is a clear example of the shadow of the scientific process, and as usual, it can lead to disaster results for future generations and may result in more dirty, less healthy communities in the near term.
As Cornell University remarkableA study on a study of more than 88,100 refereed climate shows that 99.9% of the world’s activities are the primary cause of the world’s activities to spread, to replace and to contribute to food continents as well as superchasing excessive weather conditions at a sustainable speed of the world.
The reliability of the world to dirty fuels is the primary criminal, NASA. However, Trump Management clarified According to UNEarthed documents, the initial commitment to the fossil fuel industry, which initially financed climate research and discovered the negative impact of the sector to maximize the climate disinformation to maximize profits.
While a transition to clean energy infrastructure should be carried out carefully in order to achieve energy independence and safety (goals shared in political lines), the administration comes to many green energy projects that are renewed to dirty fuels, the work that creates work, reduces the invoices and helps the country to be less dependent on coal, oil and gas.
What to do about this?
California University, Berkeley, Environmental Scientist Lucas Vargas Zeppetello said Guardian said that the report was a “complete shame” and will be among the scientists working to correct the recording during the window for a public comment. Closed 2 September.
Stay in Critical climate problems can help you determine when or how you want to do Use your voice To participate in public opinion comment requests or to reach your representatives.
Join Free bulletin For weekly updates about the latest innovations Developing our lives And Shaping our futureand don’t miss This is a wonderful list Easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
