Just like Brexit, Farage is simply telling voters what they want to hear on migration
AS Nigel Farage was standing in front of a giant union flag on an aircraft hangar at Oxford Airport, to one of the biggest concerns of the British leader British voters – an increasing number of asylum seekers who came to the UK on small boats.
But for those who have listened to Mr. Farage for many years, now there was something familiar about today’s announcement in his long political career. In fact, it was a good formula for the man who had to be the next Prime Minister of England.
What Mr. Farage offered was actually the re -packaging of what could be called the Brexit Formula .. In other words, withdraw from the basic global agreements, isolate England internationally and then wait for the rest of the world to do what England wants.
This kind of solution worked when Lord Palmerstr could send a gunshot to sit outside a foreign port in the 19th century, but now much more complex.
Great plan
Essentially, Farage argues that after becoming prime minister, he can force countries such as Pakistan, Iran, Syria and Afghanistan to take them back to thousands of irregular immigrants.
The reform leader said that those who came illegally to England will be arrested, detained and deported.
It will withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to its target and make Britain a contradictory value with Russia and Belarus. In addition, other international agreements, such as the refugee agreement for five years, will suspend.
Zia Yusuf, former president of the party, added that reform will bring a waterproof law, which means that no judgment cannot prevent a single mandatory separation.
To give people what they want
However, there is no doubt that the polished sales site offers many voters.
The two traditional main parties left a gap in the political world that could not solve the problem of small boats, and the plan, which was summarized by Farage on Tuesday, leaves the capture of Keir Starmer and Tora leader Kemi Badenoch.
Both Emek and Tories may criticize the approach of Farage, but they begin to copy their policies.
Already Tories plans to bring a policy of abandoning the ECHR, a document prepared by the conservatives.
Government ministers are looking at the polling and listening to the focus groups and know the harsh discourse of the reform of the British leader.
At the weekend, we found that a Yougov survey, 71 percent believe that Starmer’s problem is badly handled and continued to be an important concern between the economy and the voters.
Mr. Farage’s most reaction to many critics was: “What is done does not work.”
It is very difficult to discuss. But will his plan really work?
Brexit was visited again
For those who were still afraid of the political wars following the 2016 EU referendum, there was a familiar ring of pure proposals summarized by Farage in Oxford.
In 2016, it was said that if they voted to allocate British voters, they would not be a problem in making a leaving agreement and that countries would ıl ranks ında to make trade agreements under the chairmanship of the USA.
The truth was a little different. The separation took four years, two prime ministers and two elections to negotiate, and England left economically much weaker. To underline the point, Starmer effectively negotiated the second reset of this original 2020 agreement after Rishi Altak made a first effort in 2023.
In the case of trade agreements, it took years to get something with the US, and the agreement with Trump effectively effectively reduces the impact of the US president’s tariffs. There are serious questions about the influence of those who have been hurried with Australia and New Zealand.
All this is the warning notes of the British government for future negotiating powers on returns. After all, why was it so difficult to make an agreement to return immigrants to France? Because England has no muscles to force the EU to accept it.
Other problems
Former Chief Public Prosecutor Dominic Grieve clearly demonstrated that judges could use the British joint law limited by Farage and supporters to prevent deportation.
Although Yusuf is sure that he cannot prevent the deportation of any judiciary, he is not a legal expert.
In addition, at a time when Farage warned Britain that England is on the verge of civil unrest, it will be the inevitable political uprising of protests against brutal measures.
Then there will be questions about the fate of those who are sent back, and even the children will be packaged on planes.
However, the biggest fear will be international isolation. Britain will resemble a Pariah state withdrawn from human rights and international law. In the short term, EU trade will cancel agreements on data sharing and security.
For this reason, even though Farage can produce the same Glib lines that won the Brexit referendum, there is actually a danger that the consequences of doing so may be extremely harmful to the country, which is probably not successful.
