Mandelson private messages to be released today – UK politics live | Politics

At work Pippa Crerar And Henry DyerExplainer of what will happen in the Mandelson files.

Good morning. Many people despair at the quality of government in Britain at the moment, but in a sense we are living in a golden age; If you’re interested in contemporary history and want to know what’s really going on at the heart of government, you now have access to information of a kind that – sometimes – has never been available before.

Today the government is releasing a trove of information—apparently three volumes and more than 1,000 pages—containing private messages Peter Mandelson shared with government ministers and officials while he was U.S. ambassador and before his appointment. Last month a minister compared this to evidence released as part of the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war. But the Chilcot inquiry took place in the era before WhatsApp and the publication of secret memos intended for distribution in Whitehall. WhatsApp messages are much more personal; Reading them is like eavesdropping on a private conversation. Mandelson is a man of pointed, controversial views, who loves to gossip and conspire, and whose private views do not always match what he says in public. It must be fascinating.

These documents are being released because the government must comply with a modest statement offered by the Conservative Party – a House of Commons vote giving ministers the power to release information. Many modest declarations have been adopted in recent years (since this old parliamentary mechanism, forgotten for decades, was revived by Labour’s Brexit spokesman Keir Starmer during the Brexit wars) but none as far-reaching as this one.

Conservatives tabled this low-key speech because they wanted to know more about how Mandelson was appointed ambassador to the United States even though it was known at the time that he maintained a friendship with Jeffrey Epstein even after he was first convicted of child sex crimes. Like Kiran Stacey, Henry Dyer And Pippa Crerar The documents released today would imply that the State Department did not appear particularly bothered about ensuring that the so-called “mitigations” put in place to manage the risks associated with Mandelson’s appointment were too numerous, the report said.

But we’re unlikely to learn much about the broader question of why Mandelson was appointed, because it’s already clear why he got the job: he wanted it, he was close to Morgan McSweeney, the Prime Minister’s chief of staff, who had more influence over what Starmer did than anyone else, and both McSweeney and Starmer were convinced that Mandelson’s penchant for dangerous billionaires would enable him to have a good relationship with Donald Trump (though this argument is inherently flawed, because the Trump administration didn’t want him).

Instead, the main statements this afternoon will likely focus on what members of the government say about each other in private. Today on the show Chris MasonThe BBC’s political editor said some of the messages would be “intolerable”. Finance Times says: “The messages are expected to include disparaging comments about Starmer from prominent figures and Mandelson.” Politico’s London Playbook says: “A person familiar with the contents of the files told Playbook it would be ‘toe-curling’.”

Government sources say they do not expect any of these statements to lead to resignation. This isn’t much of a bonus; For the Conservative party, today will probably feel like Christmas has come early.

Ironically, one person who won’t be ashamed of any of this is Trump. Government ministers always act diplomatically and politely towards the US president in public. In private, it’s fair to assume that their views are a little more in line with those of normal people like you and me. However, parliament agreed that material deemed “harmful to the UK’s national security or international relations” would be withheld, and therefore any interesting anti-Trump information would remain secret.

James MurrayThe new health minister is giving interviews this morning. Commenting on the release of the Mandelson files, he told Sky News:

I think the level of transparency will be unprecedented. The volume of information that will emerge is unprecedented.

It is right that we do this. We have made it very clear that Mandelson’s appointment was wrong.

Parliament then decided to make this information public. The government is fully compliant with this and it is important that we deliver on our commitment to transparency.

Here is the agenda of the day.

11.30: A lobby briefing is being held in Downing Street.

14.30: Defense Secretary John Healey answers questions in the House of Commons.

Afternoon: The government is releasing the rest of the Mandelson files. The Prime Minister’s chief secretary, Darren Jones, will make a statement to MPs on the occasion of the broadcast after 15.30. The documents must be published at the latest when he gives his statement, but it may come a little earlier.

If you would like to contact me, please send a message below the line or send a message on social media during comments open hours (between 10:00 – 15:00). I can’t read all messages BTL, but if you type “Andrew” in a message addressed to me, I’m more likely to see it because I’m looking for posts containing that word.

If you want to flag something urgently, it’s best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has stopped posting from their official account on

I find it very helpful for readers to point out errors, even minor typos. No mistake is too small to be corrected. I also find your questions very interesting. I can’t promise to respond to them all, but I will try to respond as much as I can, either on BTL or sometimes on the blog.