Prevent scheme missed chances with Amess and Southport killers, report says | Prevent strategy

Prevention of the Anti -Terror Plan, the people who assassinated the deputy of the deputy Sir David Amess, and a Southport dance class, who killed three young girls missed the chance to protect.

The report is by David Anderson, who has a temporary independent review of the official plan to identify potential terrorists and remove them from violence.

Lord Anderson declared that he suffered from a long failure while trying to humiliate the man who continued to stab Amess into death, and even after a meeting to evaluate his danger when he had to seven.

The new revelations of the failures led to a complete investigation of the Amess’s family rejected by the government.

Experienced Toray deputy was stabbed in October 2021 while organizing an election surgery motivated by the attacker Ali Harbi Ali and Islamist terrorism.

At the age of 18, Ali was directed to Finive in 2014 and was seriously evaluated by the channel program that deals with the largest concern.

Anderson found that Ali was given a mentor, but he added: “When the planned mentoring program almost started for him, Peter was allowed.”

In the report, he says: “Some of them were consistent with practice at that time, but most of the bad judiciary, bad communication and follow -up, followed a long failure. After a contract was signed for the seven mentoring session, only one of them took place.”

Ali had acted as if he was asleep, and Anderson found the following: “Even if all the sessions were completed, it cannot be a certain thing that it would be shifted to a terrorist mentality, despite the prevention of a crime committed a few years later.”

Ali’s case was closed in 2016 (one year after clearing it by Finive and Channel, he wanted to travel to join the Islamic state in Syria. After he was blocked for this purpose, a deputy began to do research for the murder.

It provides a complete tariff service for the murder.

As of 2016, the government has promised more examination of whether the chance has been missed.

The Amess family requested an appropriate investigation into witnesses search and cross -examination power and failures.

A family spokesman said that the new revelations strengthened the views of the new revelations: “This is a mourning family… Just like other mourning families, the man who killed him was allowed to shift from the net of the state, and he questioned what was done to ensure that they question the same way.

In addition to the Amess case, the report looks at how the Southport killer Axel Rudakubana, who killed three young girls in a dance class last summer and found a new potential for a new potential, was handled.

After the teachers expressed their concerns about him from 2019 to 2021, he refused to receive the Rudakubana case three years before he committed the savagery that shocked Britain.

Although there were concerns about his interest in violence, there was no sign that he was directed by a terrorist ideology.

In the report, it concludes that a specialist should be examined by the channel after the first reference to Rudakubana’s case in December 2019. This did not happen.

Anderson says: “If this was, a mentor may have been offered to make a difference.”

A public investigation into Southport murders is already ongoing.

Anderson said that Southport was “equivalent to the seriousness of a terrorist act”, and the 17 -year -old killer was sentenced to a lifetime imprisonment for three murders for three murders, and that the murders of the other eight children and two other adults trying to protect them were murders.

Anderson said: “A few years before the attacks, both perpetrators were referred to the prevention of schools by their schools… Prover’s channel program for early interventions had the capacity to address the kind of concerns in these referrals. But in no case did it.”

The report proposes the expansion of a potential dramatic Consta to include individuals who do not have a fixed ideology but do not admire extreme violence or mass wounded attacks ”.

It also proposes more transparency, better information sharing and participation.

Anderson also says that it may function better if it is dependent on a wider protection and violence protection system ”.

Anderson said: orum I praise the teachers who worried that each of these young people were on a dangerous road years before the crimes of their crimes were committed.

“It is a difficult and sensitive task to direct people in a way that can lead to terrorism. Success is never guaranteed, but the process can work with the help of talented and stable practitioners and often do it.

“When a chance is presented and does not take it, it is very important to learn all possible courses.”

Anderson said that in order to prevent the reforms undertaken and planned, it should make it difficult to re -emerge and add: “However, more needs to be done. It should be clear that people who admire extreme violence may be appropriate to prevent even when they are not a noticeable ideology.

“Prevent the needs to increase the game in the online world where most radicalization is currently taking place. I believe that in the long term, Consten can work better as part of a comprehensive violence prevention and protection strategy.”