Sarah Ferguson branded toxic by PR expert as she’s axed from charities | Royal | News

Sarah Ferguson’s public opinion, Jeffrey Epstein E -Posta in the midst of the discussion of a series of charities after a series of charities lies in Tatters.

The Duchess of York faces serious criticisms after defining it as a “supreme friend” – benevolent organizations hurry to get themselves away from it.

On Monday, the child Darüceze Julia’s house, after revealing that he had sent E -mail to Epstein in 2011, terminated his relationship with Fergie – promised not to contact him again.

Natasha Allergy Research Foundation, British Heart Foundation, Children’s Literacy Charity Authority, Breast Cancer Preventing and Retired Service Animals National Foundation also removed 65 Duchess of Himaye roles.

Teenage Cancer Trust, whom he supported when he started his first unit in 1990, confirmed that he was dismissed.

Industry Inside those said Mirror that the discussion could make Fergie a “toxic” brand and that she and her disgraceful ex -husband Prince Andrew can destroy the capacity to provide financial support for 65.

A close confidant of Fergie announced in 2019 that he wrote the e -mail at a time when he was discovered dead while waiting to be tried in the prison cell in 2019. Fergie apologized to Epstein after connecting him to pedophilia during an interview: “I didn’t use the word P about you,” he said.

PR Guru Mark Borkowski warned Fergie was in danger of being “toxic” and described the leaked e -mails as “reputation napalmi”.

“The reputation of the Duchess and the ability to earn a living behind this reputation directly affect Andrew’s finance directly. The leaking E -Posts are reputation napalmı … Julia’s house cutting bonds are not a side note;

“If a child darüceze outweighs the risk of an association from the patronage of an association, the decision is clear: toxic. No institutions are Bellwethers for public trust.

A representative of Teenage Cancer Trust said: “We decided to end our relationship with the Duchess of York, and today we are not the boss of young cancer confidence.

In an official statement, Julia’s house said: “This weekend York Duchess of York Jeffrey Epstein shared with the shared information about the correspondence … Julia’s house, as a boss of the aid organization will be inappropriate.

The founders of the Natasha Allergy Research Foundation Nadim and Tanya Ednan-Laperouse expressed Duchess’s discomfort on Epstein’s e-mail. His 15 -year -old daughters Natasha died tragically in 2016 after consuming a baguette from a sesame man who was allergic at Heathrow Airport.

British Airways fell ill and suffered a heart stop. While his body was blown away, the Duchess of York, who returned from a business trip, was sitting behind them.

In his 2019 interview, Duchess said: “They were not mourning: it was a different scale of misery.

He chose to offer comfort, established a permanent friendship with the family and was appointed as the boss of the charity. Today, however, Natasha’s parents said: “We were uncomfortable with reading the correspondence with York’s Duchess Sarah, Jeffrey Epstein. Sarah Ferguson has not been actively interested in a charity for several years.

He continued: “He was a boss, but in the light of the last revelation, we decided to continue to be associated with philanthropy. We would like to thank him for his kindness and support in the past.”

Breast cancer, Fergie’s role only months after the “no longer boss” announced. The Duchess of York had previously spoke warmly about the aid agency following his own breast cancer treatment, including mastectomy and reconstruction surgery before the diagnosis of skin cancer.

A spokesman for breast cancer said: “Duchess of York is no longer the boss of preventing breast cancer. We recommended him this decision and thank him for the past support.”

In addition, the Literacy of the Children’s Literacy Authority said: “Considering the recent information about the Duchess of York and Jeffrey Epstein, the Children’s Literacy Aid Aid Aid asked the York Duchess of York to take a step as a boss.

He continued: “We are grateful for the support of the Duchess of York for years to the literacy of children, but now we think it will not be appropriate to continue as a boss of philanthropy.”

Liberal Democratic Deputy Sarah Olney, representing Richmond Park, said: “I think any aid organization will want to know that the trustees observe the highest possible child protection standards and I really think that these e -mails have weakened it.

When he questioned whether the Duchess has to lose his other bosses, he said, “It seems to be the right thing to do. Frankly, it’s a matter for them. But I really think it makes the position of these revelations about these e -mails.”

The discussion revolves around an interview published in March 2011, where the Duchess of York apologized for his long -term partner Epstein, an £ 15,000.

“I hate pedophilia and the sexual abuse of children, and I know that this is a huge judicial error for me. When I can, I will pay back the money and will have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein again.”

However, almost a month later, on April 26, Duchess secretly contacted Epstein from a private E -Posta account.

The message said: “As you know, I certainly not say the word P (pedophile).