DAVID MARCUS: Trump takes on Smithsonian’s lefty bias and statue-toppling libs melt down

In 2020, the Democrats, who manifested the overthrow of the statues of American heroes such as Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson and Teddy Roosevelt, are suddenly worried to improve the Smithsonian museums to better express the American exceptionalism of the Trump administration.

Please separate us.

Consider the Governor of Minnesota Tim Walz and the white man Taco Annoisseur, who was spontaneously supported by X this week.

The White House has reviewed the entire Smithsonian Museum and exhibit content before 250 before the United States in 2026

“If you are trying to delete the date, you’re on the wrong side,” he wrote. But where was this religious anger when the protesters tear the 90 -year -old Christopher Columbus statue in the state capital in 2020?

The deletion of history was made to an angry gang without any process. I know, because in the 2022 article, which is a fluffy Bubblegum title, “Meet the domestic activist who overthrew the Christopher Columbus statue.”

Would you like to guess where this article was published? I swear, I am not doing this: Smithsonian magazine.

Here is a jewel without apologizing, sympathetic to vandalism, “‘This is a good thing because we suffered from us [Columbus] He did it to us, ‘Dorene said, a ojibwe woman who brings a few children and grandchildren to protest. “

I’m sure you’ll be shocked to know that the Smithsonian article does not quote a single Columbus supporter and even accept that such a position is possible from a remote. Basically, he lamented that the statue did not fall earlier.

This is exactly the unilateral, left -wing version of the date when President Trump and his administration tried to correct the proposals of museums.

Don’t get me wrong, Smithsonian is a great institution. However, the leftist lean, the Supreme Court for a long time, including the first exclusion of Clarence Clarence Thomas from the Afro -American History Museum.

This describes a matter that goes far farther than 2020’s radicalism. For decades, perhaps for half a century, the progresses have had hegemonic control over our cultural and historical institutions; The rules went out of undisputed.

In the event versions, the pressure of Americans is always wrong for almost everything that is wrong in the world. An exhibition on Cuban migration blames the US intervention in Latin America and is completely named Fidel Castro.

All this raises the question of how we can decide how to tell the story of our nation?

In 2020, under the approval of the Democrats, they were protesters who took decisions illegally. And even when the statues were “officially abolished, they never contained referendum, but rather Wokesters formed a small number of committees and moved with our history.

According to A Last surveyOnly 37% of the democrats do not think that there is something to be celebrated when they are 250 years old next year. The reason for this is that the elite and cultural institutions in the academy instill the “well -educated” version of these events.

The story of history changes over time. For example, until the 1950s, the Crusades began to be seen as a kind of racist, colonized initiative, and today is mostly visited by some academics who are seen as a necessary opposing attack against Muslim aggression.

This does not mean that a version of events about Crusades or Civil War is correct or wrong. But what is wrong is to ignore the arguments in favor of American size to reveal our dark belly.

Click here for more Fox News idea

Essentially, it was decided that patriotism did not belong to the museum. Museums are a strange stagnation in the face of the history of the museums, and there is no reason for the Trump administration to allow it to declare it anymore.

Walz and the sculpture hill should really do this. They have already proved that they will happily destroy their history in a way that fits their agenda, so their conservatives will stand to deny a seat at the Smithsonian table.

Under Trump, the process of making changes in Smithsonian is open, public and transparent. Finally, this could be a national debate, and not only leftists who force anti -American ideas to our throat.

This process is more than ever in 2020, when history was taken from us. Many Americans, welcome to the shore from the shore.

Click here to read more than David Marcus