Texas bill allowing residents to sue out-of-state abortion pill providers reaches governor | Texas

Greg Abbott, in which the residents of Texas go to the governor’s table, where the residents of Texas go to the governor’s table, a measure that would allow the state to establish the state as the first person who tries to fall into the most common abortion method.

Supporters say that the state is an important tool to implement abortion, to protect women and fetuses.

Competitors see this not only as another way of restraining in abortion, but also as an attempt to encourage abortion providers outside of Texas to encourage the laws in their states and to encourage a kind of alertness.

If the measure becomes a law, it is almost certain to trigger the legal challenges from abortion rights supporters.

Within the scope of the measure, the inhabitants of Texas may sue from those who produce, carry or provide drugs that cause abortion up to $ 100,000 to everyone in Texas. Women who receive pills for their own use are not responsible.

Pursuant to the bill, the providers can be ordered to pay $ 100,000. However, only the pregnant woman, the man who impregnates her or other close relatives can collect the entire amount. Anyone who sues can only get $ 10,000 and go to the remaining $ 90,000 aid organization.

MPs also added tongue to worrying that women were trying to end their pregnancy by men or abusive partners who raped them. For example, a man who impregnates a woman through sexual assault is not appropriate.

The precaution has a provisions that make identity or medical details about a woman who takes the pills.

Until these provisions were added, a few major Texas abortion prevention groups supported the bill with a payment limit of $ 10,000 for people who were not injured by abortion.

The idea of ​​using citizens instead of government officials to implement abortion bans is not new in Texas. Months before the US Supreme Court’s way to enter into force of other state prohibitions was at the center of the 2021 law without restricting abortion.

In previous laws, citizens can collect $ 10,000 to bring a successful lawsuit against a provider or someone who helps someone to get abortion. However, this precaution did not explicitly try to pursue non -governmental providers.

Pills abortion is a difficult issue for competitors. Before the 2022 Supreme Court’s decision, it was the most common method of abortion that overthrew Roe v Wade and allowed states to implement abortion bans.

They have been used more widely since then. Although their presence is forcing abortion bans at all stages of Texas and other 11 states, it is an important reason for the national increase in the number of abortion.

The pills continued to flow partially, because at least eight democratic leaderships enacted laws trying to protect the medical providers from legal consequences when they use Telehealth to prescribe pills to women in the states where abortion is illegal.

Fund Texas Choice General Manager Anna Rupani said that the measure aims to threaten non -governmental providers and women in Texas.

“It’s about this creepy effect,” he said. “This is another prohibition of abortion that allows the state to control people’s health lives and reproductive decisions.”

Earlier this year, a Texas judge ordered a New York doctor to pay more than $ 100,000 to pay an abortion pill to a woman.

The same provider Dr Maggie Carpenter faces criminal charges from a Louisiana prosecutor for similar claims.

New York officials call the laws of the states of the states to prevent the extradition of the carpenters and to refuse to present civil judiciary.

The higher court side with Louisiana or Texas officials may damage the laws of shield.

Meanwhile, Texas and Florida general lawyers are trying to join Idaho, Kansas and Missouri to get the US Food and Pharmaceutical Management approvals for Mifepristone, one of the drugs used in combination for drug abortion. Because of these concerns, they say he needs tight controls.

If the states are successful, it is possible to distribute the drug, not by telehealth, but personally.

American women’s innkeeper college and gynecologists, including large medical organizations say the drug is safe.