Should big tech be allowed to mine Australians’ text and data to train AI? The Productivity Commission is considering it | Artificial intelligence (AI)

The Productivity Commission examines whether technology companies should be exempted from the copyright rules that stop text and data of companies to educate artificial intelligence models.

In his temporary report on “Data and Digital Economy”, PC used the copyright as a case study on how the current regulatory framework of Australia can be adapted to manage the risks of artificial intelligence.

An important suggestion from the temporary report is that the federal government should make a comprehensive examination of regulations to block the potential gaps that can be used by “bad actors” using artificial intelligence.

Last week, Scott Farquuhar, the founding partner of the software company Atlassian, called for Australia’s copyright rules for a “emergency ür revision and argued that they did not step with other comparable countries.

Farquuhar said that exemptions for text and data mining to train large language models can “unlock billions of dollars of foreign investment in Australia”.

This was a suggestion Rejected by Copyright AgencyIt is an organization that collects and distributes copyrights to thousands of copyrights. Instead, the Agency argued that the government would create a new compensation plan for content creators used by technology companies to train AI models.

_{Registration: AU Breaking News E -Post}

Stephen King, one of the two commission members who pioneered the PC’s investigation into using the opportunities of the digital economy, said, “Copyright is a great example of what Australia should lean back and ask: ‘Is our laws in accordance with AI?’ ‘

“Open damage is that an AI company can use copyright materials without appropriate compensation.

“Can we approach AI in the same way as we approach the copyright right through copyright collections? The music is played everywhere, so we gathered societies authorized under our competition laws and singers, songwriters and creators act on behalf of the creators.”

King said that the PC requested feedback about other options before a last advice by the end of the year.

“We have a fair exemption that does not include text and data mining, maybe this must be exemption – as long as AI companies earn legal copies and pay for it.”

The Commission said that artificial intelligence in the third of the five thematic report can revive Australia’s Moribund productivity.

The PC modeling showed that even the most conservative prediction will provide a support of $ 116 billion to the economy in the next decade.

King said that in 10 years, the average Australia’s real wage has turned into a $ 4,300 -dollar hit, and the real benefits could be much larger.

The Commission recommended to create a inclusive AI -specific legislation and warned that clumsy or over -regulation is at risk of drowning the potentially transformative benefits of technology.

This message is likely to be welcomed by the government, Productivity Minister Andrew Leigh supports this approach.

However, King said he did not discuss the commission for a minimalist approach to AI regulation.

“This is not a slight touch. What we say is that AI will make bad actors easy, cheaper and faster. However, most of these harmful behaviors are already illegal.”

“Let’s understand where the damages are and see if they are covered with existing laws. And if so, let’s make sure that the organizers have resources and powers to stop the bad actors.”

The PC’s interim report also supported the rules of confidentiality to include a “box tracking ğı where businesses do not comply with the letter of law but do not comply with the soul of the law”.

The Commission said that the government should support new ways to allow individuals and businesses to access and share data about them ”.