The leadership rumours inside Labour that speak volumes about Keir Starmer’s future as prime minister
TOn Wednesday, the images of Rachel Reeves crying at the front banks during PMQs – only hours after the government was forced to climb 5 billion pounds on prosperity – sharp. Sir Keir’s best team seemed on the brink of disintegration.
However, the next day, the Prime Minister went to fight, and at the same time insisted that the chancellor seemed more cheerful.
A minister in his tears would inform any day of the year. However, on a day when the questions about the Prime Minister’s leadership were already spread to the documents, just a few days before Mark, the image was further shaken for labor, and only served to add fuel to the growing questions about whether it was the right person for work.
Angela Rayner has been whispering for weeks. The Housing Secretary’s attempts to close rumors – saying that there is no desire to keep the best job – did little to reduce speculation.
The rumors tell a lot about Sir Keir’s leadership and the level of discontent within the party about the direction of the government.
The worker gained majority in last year’s general elections. They had a clear task called ‘change plan’ and had a real sense of optimism. But only a year later, this optimism is good and really went.
After repeated attempts to reset the narrative, the Prime Minister’s authority was damaged, while ruthless voting voters show that voters have returned.
And this week, the humiliating welfare disaster, who saw that the Prime Minister’s reforms entirely confronts only the greatest rebellion of their premiere – contributed only to the assembly problems.
Behind the scenes, now he’s shaking more than ever before the Labor Party goes to the next place.
If the welfare vote on Tuesday proves something, the left wing of workers’ deputies is much more left than the leader of their parties.
Starmer is trying to present a government not to draw the party to the right to fight against the threat of reform, but also a government that meets the expectations of the British people.
However, it did not work as a result of failures in Downing Street and astonishment from his own deputies.
Currently, there are increasing calls for reset at 10. However, the problem is that the Prime Minister does not try to do this for the first time. We have seen repeated attempts to draw a line under the mistakes and bends before the government, but there is no real change in the direction.
Although Starmer insisted that his chancellor stayed here, there is an increasing feeling that the PM would not really draw a line last year without any change.
If it can accompany a clear plan to add gaps in public finance after a few urine, including previous shovels, including welfare chaos and winter fuel payments, it can reversed its reserves, as well as a real strategy to reduce migration.
However, if this fails and Starmer cannot use a change to save his authority, the Prime Minister has a small but increasing chance before the next election.
If the party, which is called ‘soft left’, is now in labor, the Rayner -led party offers a real left proposal (and good), if it offers a real left proposal that could be much more effective than Starmer’s pragmatism (and did it well). Particularly considering the proposals of Nigel Farage’s two children’s benefit limit and restoring winter fuel payments to everyone, it seems quite well with the British people.
However, sitting on the right of Rayner is also seen as a powerful contestant to achieve Wes Streeting – PM. As of last month, the third most popular working politician among the party members is loved by the party-behind Rayner, who is not a worker deputy and the Mayor of Manchester Andy Burnham.
So far, he proved that he was a safe pair of hands when it comes to health care, and he directed one of the few departments that seemed to be a little successful.
While both street and rayner allies are trying to close fiery speculation on possible leadership proposals, a series of parties see local elections in May for the future of the party in May next year.
However, there is an important health warning that Starmer has to accompany any speech of being replaced. A large majority won. Seeing that Britain has been ruled by three different prime ministers in two months, the years of Toray should not deceive anyone’s changing it, it will be an easy job.
The only official way to remove the party’s leader is that 20 percent of workers’ deputies nominated a candidate for the leader and triggers a leadership competition. With Labour’s current majority, it requires at least 80 deputies to get behind a single candidate – there is no easy job.
Therefore, Starmer’s chances of replacement is now small. But the clock passes. Voters do not believe that there is something different from the “14 -year Tory failure ğı, which the Labor Party frequently speaks of. Every day, which is allowed to attract the attention of this idea, the possibility of a blow increases.
