The real assault on aspiration isn’t tax reform: It’s inequality

Dr Carl Rhodes writes that when the pathways of desire become blocked, the political rhetoric of desire becomes disconnected from economic reality.

SINCE THE TREASURER JIM CHALMERS He released his Federal Budget On May 12, critics on the political right attacked relentlessly.

Some of these are downright funny, Daily Telegraph I call the budget “a”the great taxer communist manifesto” with Australian He accuses Chalmers of giving him a salaryclass war‘.

One of the more serious accusations is that by removing tax breaks for investors, Chalmers is undermining the individual desires that fuel economic growth and prosperity.

The idea that tax policy can be used to encourage entrepreneurship and ambition is a well-worn part of conservative politics. The question is whether this still fits Australia’s current economic reality.

Politics of longing

At the center of the debate are: reforms Negative guidance and capital gains tax aimed at addressing spiraling house prices that keep working people out of the market.

Supporters argue that taxing wages more heavily than income from asset ownership distorts incentives and makes the system less fair, especially for young Australians.

The opposing view is that preferential tax regulations encourage investment and employment creation. Among the most vocal critics was National MP Barnaby JoyceWHO reported:

“I think they destroy the inspiration of entrepreneurial people.”

opposition leader Angus Taylor followed a similar path, condemn the budget aspect:

“Attack on aspiration” and we warn the Labor Party “poisonous taxes” will “Crush the spirit of reward for hard work that underpins our nation’s success.”

Business leaders joined the chorus and a group of young entrepreneurs tagged the budget ‘aspiration haze.’

It’s tempting to see this as something simple ideological distinction There is justice on the Left and longing on the Right. The truth is more complex.

KPMG’s “shrinking middle”

relatively unaware research piece released by accounting firm KPMG The day before the budget sheds light on what’s really happening to aspirations in Australia. Remarkably, this comes not from a union or a Left-leaning think tank, but from the heart of corporate Australia.

KPMG found Australia’s wealth gap has widened significantly over the past five years due to rising asset prices, particularly housing. Median household wealth increased from $1.26 million to $1.56 million, while median wealth remained steady at $700,000.

This means that while overall wealth has increased, the gains have been disproportionately captured by those who already have wealth.

The result is what KPMG describes as a “narrowing of the middle.” Households, which once represented the economic mainstream, are being left out as asset owners step forward and others fall behind.

This raises the possibility that inequality is becoming increasingly entrenched and increasingly shaped by inherited advantages.

Making aspiration safe again

It is this “shrinking middle”, not the removal of tax cuts, that represents the real threat to the targets.

Contrary to Joyce and Taylor’s claims, attempts to rebalance the tax system do not threaten desires. It is threatened by an economy in which access to wealth increasingly depends on what you already own or inherit, rather than on what you do.

Desire requires reliable pathways from effort to reward. When these avenues are blocked, the rhetoric of aspiration becomes disconnected from economic reality as conservative politicians cling to the tired economic argument about expired incentives.

Tax concessions for asset owners are championed in the name of opportunity, but the unequal system they fuel continually closes out opportunities for working people who don’t already own property, especially young Australians.

This is where justice and longing meet, not as ideology but as lived reality.

When educated Australians with good jobs can’t afford to buy a home or delay starting a family because of cost, that desire isn’t under attack from tax reform. It is undermined by an economy that no longer rewards effort.

When this happens, the aspiration ceases to be a promise and becomes an illusion, and the legitimacy of the economic system begins to erode.

It’s just the beginning

Joyce and Taylor are right that Australia needs the desire to grow and develop, but this desire needs to be available to everyone, especially those who did not start life with family wealth and privilege.

The tax changes introduced in this budget signal a willingness to meet this challenge. But reversing the erosion of aspirations will require more than targeted adjustments to tax policy. It calls for a broader program of structural reform that addresses housing affordability, wage growth, access to secure work, and the distribution of income and wealth across the economy.

Without such reforms, inequality will continue to harden into a system where opportunities are inherited rather than earned, and aspirations will remain in the hands of those who already have a stake in them.

The question is not whether Australia values ambition, but whether it is willing to rebuild the economic conditions that make that ambition credible for everyone.

Carl Rhodes is Professor of Business and Society at the University of Technology Sydney. Wrote several books On the relationship between liberal democracy and contemporary capitalism. You can follow him on X/Twitter @ProfCarlRhodes.

Support independent journalism Subscribe to IA.