UK Online Safety Act risks ‘seriously infringing’ free speech, says X | Internet safety

Elon Musk’s X platform, Britain’s online Security Law (OSA), said that when deepening the measures of protection of children from harmful content, it is under the risk of free speech.

The social media company said that the “praised” intentions of the action were overshadowed by the communication guard of the aggressive application by the communication guard.

In a statement published on the platform, X said: “Many of them are concerned that a plan aiming to keep children safe in the apparently is at the risk of serious violation of the right to free expression of the people.”

The authority added that the risk was not a surprise for the United Kingdom, because the deputies crossed OSA and made a “conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of“ online security ”.

“It is fair to ask if the UK citizens are equally aware of the compromise made,” he said.

The action of political right on both sides of the Atlantic entered into force on July 25 after new restrictions that have reached pornography under the age of 18 and pursue harmful content to children.

The owner of the X, Musk, said that the purpose of the action was “suppression of the people” days after the rules entered into force. He also retweered a petition that called for the abolition of the law, which has received more than 450,000 signatures.

X was forced A little content to restrict age As a result, the reform British Party adds to Furore, promising to abolish the action. The commitment of the reform encouraged Peter Kyle, the United Kingdom Technology Secretary, to blame Nigel Farage with Pedophil Jimmy Savile, an interpretation that an apology deserves as an apology.

Referring to OCOM, X said that the regulators took a “heavy -handed approach ıyla to implement the action by adding“ rapidly increasing execution resources ”and“ bureaucratic surveillance layers ”.

The statement said: “The law of the law is at risk of remaining in the shade with the width of regulatory access. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer.”

X said that it is compatible with the law, but the threat of execution and fines that global turnover may be as high as 10% of social media platforms such as X may encourage censorship of legitimate content to prevent punishment.

The statement also stated that the plans to create a national internet intelligence investigation team to monitor social media for symptoms of anti -immigrant disorder. X said that the proposal could be positioned as a security measures, but “clearly went beyond this intention”.

“This movement has initiated alarm bells for free speaking advocates who described it as extreme and potentially restrictive.

Ofcom spokesman OSA’nın freedom of expression contains provisions, he said.

“New rules require technology firms to struggle with criminal content and prevent children from seeing the types of harmful defined materials for themselves. There is no need to restrict legal content for adult users. In fact, they should carefully think how users protect users to freedom of expression while keeping users safe.”

The UK’s Science, Innovation and Technology Department was approached for comment.