UK’s Turing AI Institute bosses respond to staff anger
The heads of the British National Institute of Artificial Intelligence (AI) said that in recent months, the aid organization is “difficult” for the staff because it has been “important” changes.
Coming later Personnel increased “serious and increasing concerns” This week a complaint of information sent to the aid commission.
He warned that the organ, which received 100 million pounds from the government, had instructed Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, to give priority to the defense and threatened it with the financing of the financing.
In a letter by BBC, President Doug Gurr said that the Turing Institute would “take steps at a time when it needs”.
Government officials and Turing Institute staff, including a new senior working group, he said.
However, the defense should not be the only focus of the defense, and some of the studies on health and environmental issues will continue in accordance with the purposes of both the government and private investors.
The information aircraft defined the response of the management as “performer”.
“Just talk, there’s no action, nothing has changed,” they said, they’re talking to the BBC about the condition of anonymity because they’re afraid of losing their jobs for their speeches.
Dr Gurr and General Manager Dr Jean Innes did not directly respond directly to the accusations of noticers about a “retaliation” and “vulnerable” poisonous inner culture.
The couple said that they did not see the letter sent to the Aid Commission shared with the BBC.
They were attached to the information flying instructions of the Turing Institute and we are determined to carry out our work with honesty, honesty and transparency, and we believe that the culture of clarity and accountability is necessary. “
The Turing Institute, which was founded in 2015 as the leading AI research center of the UK, was shaken by the internal discontent and criticism of research activities.
The transition to focus on defense represents an important pivot for the institution financed by the public.
Both the informants and the technology secretary of the Institute said that they wanted new leaders – but the letter did not mention any changes in the management team.
In recent months, a series of senior personnel have left the organization and the bosses, more people will be made unnecessary as they continue to restructure or said that their contracts will not be renewed.
